Bitgert: Scam Or Solid Investment? (2024)

The Bitgert ecosystem is currently based on the BNB Chain, however, they have developed their own blockchain, which claims to handle over 100,000 transactions per second with zero cost per transaction. Bitgert claimed that its blockchain had processed over 25 million transactions as of May 2024, and with over 600,000 users.

Bitgert was first launched as an app on BSC in July 2021. The project was initially called Bitrise, and its native token had the ticker BRISE. In December 2021, Bitrise rebranded to Bitgert. The rebranding did not affect the token or its ticker, and the platform has continued to operate on BSC since.

In February 2022, Bitgert launched its own blockchain network using a novel “proof of authority” (PoA) validation mechanism. This new network is commonly referred to as Bitgert or Brise Chain. The project promotes itself as a platform with zero gas fees and the ability to process up to 100,000 transactions per second (TPS). If the claim is true, it will make the blockchain one of the fastest blockchains, behind TON Network and Aptos, which support 104,000 and 160,000 TPS respectively.

Although Bitgert claims to be a “zero gas fee” chain, some very small transaction fees are involved in using the blockchain. These fees are typically fractions of a cent per transaction, paid in the BRISE token. The Bitgert network is compatible with Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), allowing for projects launched on Ethereum, or other EVM chains, to move their project across to the network with minimal effort.

BRISE is the native cryptocurrency of the Bitgert Chain. It was originally launched as a token on BNB Chain, when Bitgert (then known as Bitrise) was a blockchain application. Although the project still maintains a token address on BSC for the BRISE token, when Bitgert launched its own blockchain, BRISE was issued as the native cryptocurrency on the network. It is also now available on Ethereum.

Bitgert has implemented a buyback program in which it purchases BSC-based BRISE tokens and burns them. It appears that the project will eventually replace the entire BSC-based BRISE supply with the BRISE version native to the Bitgert Chain.

BRISE can be used for staking and to pay the small gas fees on the Bitgert Chain. It can also be used within dApps connected to the platform, such as the Bitgert exchange or peer-to-peer marketplace. Staking BRISE is possible on both BSC and the Bitgert Chain, and stakers can earn BUSD rewards, however, it is unclear where the staking rewards come from and whether the staking mechanism is sustainable in the long term. Transacting in the BRISE token occurs an automatic 12% tax which goes back to the project.

The Bitgert project has been the subject of online controversy and speculation, particularly concerning the identities of its founders, the audits it has undergone, it’s decentralisation and its charitable announcements. The project claims to offer near-zero fees and speeds of up to 100,000 transactions per second, which has raised red flags among analysts and investors. If the claimed capabilities of the blockchain are true, it brings to question why isn’t it more widely used among crypto enthusiasts?

The project claims that the Bitgert blockchain has solved the blockchain trilemma, which is that increasing scalability often affects decentralisation or security. Likewise, increasing decentralisation or security can reduce scalability. The project claims to be decentralised and secure, however, there is no readily available information or concrete proof of either. If Bitgert chain had truly solved the blockchain trilemma, they would have been the first to do so and likely would have garnered much more attention due to their sophisticated technology.

The identities of the founders of Bitgert remain unknown years after the launch of its blockchain. This has led to speculation that the team behind the project are using fake identities. The project’s website previously featured an “Our Team” page with names that could not be cross-referenced anywhere else online. The page has since been removed entirely.

The project has also come under scrutiny for its platform audits, which were carried out by the Bitgert team themselves. The team gave themselves a 98% security rating, raising concerns about the platform’s transparency and security. The whitepaper explaining the project is littered with grammatical errors, with the project’s details seemingly kept ambiguous throughout. In addition, Bitgert has claimed plans to donate to a charity but has not provided any details about the charity or its plans. This announcement without accompanying details has unsettled investors and adds further to the questionable legitimacy of the project.

Another point of concern is the role of BRISE, the native cryptocurrency of the Bitgert Chain, and the on-chain services offered by the platform. Many of the services promoted by Bitgert, such as staking and token swaps, seem to be based on the BNB blockchain, leaving it unclear how much they use the Bitgert Chain and its native coin.

It is hard to say whether or not Bitgert, or the project’s token BRISE is a good investment. The BRISE token has an incredibly low price, sitting at a minuscule $US0.0000001512 as of May 3, 2024. However, the maximum supply of tokens sits at over 400 trillion tokens, with a fully diluted valuation of $US65 million. This means that for the BRISE token to double, the diluted valuation of the project would need to increase by $US65 million.

The BRISE token has previously reached an all-time high price of $US0.00000184, so a gain from its current price is not out of the question. The project makes good use of marketing, and draws in investors with it’s low token price and bold claims. However, for a project with limited users and questionable legitimacy, the likelihood of it increasing substantially in value is low.

This article is not an endorsem*nt of any particular cryptocurrency, broker or exchange nor does it constitute a recommendation of cryptocurrency or CFDs as an investment class. Cryptocurrency is unregulated in Australia and your capital is at risk. Trading in contracts for difference (CFDs) is riskier than conventional share trading, not suitable for the majority of investors, and includes the potential for partial or total loss of capital. You should always consider whether you can afford to lose your money before deciding to trade in CFDs or cryptocurrency, and seek advice from an authorised financial advisor.