Border Wall System - Frequently Asked Questions (2024)

The completion of each project will vary based on the timing of each contract award and any unforeseen circ*mstances that may impact the construction schedule.

Beginning in 2007, CBP has spent approximately $2.3 billion to construct the legacy border fence and associated infrastructure along the Southwest border.

On average, the cost to CBP to construct a new border wall or replace existing legacy fence is approximately $6.5 million per mile.

On average, CBP budgets $50-55 million per year to maintain and repair several hundred gates, thousands of miles roads and bridges, approximately two thousand lighting and electrical systems, hundreds of drainage systems and grates, and thousands of acres of vegetation and debris removal from infrastructure.

CBP works with federal, tribal, state, and local agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the public to obtain information and data related to potential environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic impacts that may result from the border infrastructure projects. The information aids CBP in its analysis of possible impacts and assists in identifying measures that will be implemented during construction to avoid or minimize impacts to the greatest extent practicable. CBP is currently in the process of evaluating information and data obtained from its outreach and field surveys in the Rio Grande Valley and is preparing an analysis of potential environmental impacts from the construction of its Fiscal Year 2018 funded Levee/Border Wall system projects.

CBP’s approach to vegetation management will vary along the border wall alignment to address local conditions, including erosion control, while achieving optimal visibility within the enforcement zone. CBP conducts environmental surveys of the proposed enforcement zone area to identify critical habitat and other biological and cultural resources that may be present. Based on these surveys, CBP will avoid or minimize impacts to those resources to the greatest extent practicable. Where impacts are not avoidable, CBP works with stakeholders to identify appropriate mitigation measures.

The current types of border barrier along the Southwest border include picket fence, concrete levee wall with steel bollards, floating fences, steel bollards, vehicle bollards, and “Normandy” barriers.

In 2007, a number of low-cost solutions were tested as part of the Fence Lab project. This project was implemented to determine which barrier designs could best meet U.S. Border Patrol’s operational requirements and be deployed rapidly along the Southwest border. Rapid deployment, the estimated cost of construction and repair, and the ability to withstand severe impacts and disable vehicles were just a few of the criteria that went into the evaluation of the proposed solutions at Fence Lab. Additional prototypes were developed and tested in 2017 to replace and close gaps in the legacy fence.

While none of the prototypes tested in 2017 met all of CBP’s operational requirements, they provided valuable data to assist CBP in selecting design elements that could be used on border wall designs in the future.

Most of CBP’s legacy pedestrian fence is located in the San Diego, Yuma, El Centro, Tucson, El Paso, and Rio Grande Valley Sectors. Most of CBP’s legacy vehicle fence is located in the Tucson, El Paso, and Yuma Sectors.

U.S. Border Patrol’s operational needs determine the locations and priority for the border wall. The final alignment is based on geographic characteristics along the Southwest border, such as hills, rivers, mountains, forests, and desert.

There are approximately 354 miles of pedestrian barriers and 300 miles of vehicle barriers along the Southwest border, for a total of 654 miles.

Yes, landowners will continue to have access to their land on the south side of the wall. CBP is coordinating with landowners to ensure their concerns and considerations for continued access are addressed in the final design, including the size of motorized gates that will be installed. U. S. Border Patrol may, at its discretion, enter into a pre-arranged, written agreement with landowners to determine on a case-by-case basis when and how long each gate will remain open. Separate written agreements for gate openings and closings can be made for special circ*mstances (e.g. dove hunting season).

It is always CBP’s preference to acquire property through a voluntary, negotiated sale. The Government will attempt to negotiate an offer to sell using survey data and value estimates gleaned from the surveying process. The Government will attempt to negotiate an offer to sell before moving forward with exercising eminent domain. However, if the Government and landowner are unable to reach a negotiated sale or if the Government is unable to obtain clean title, the Government will need to file an eminent domain action. In such instances, the matter is referred to the local United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) to file a Declaration of Taking. USAO attorneys will meet with landowners in an effort to negotiate a voluntary offer to sell prior to filing a Declaration of Taking.

Landowners will maintain their access to irrigation lines and canals.

The primary goal of the border wall and other tactical infrastructure projects is to gain effective control of the border. Border wall construction is intended to provide persistent impedance and denial to illegal cross-border activity. Border wall systems provide U.S. Border Patrol agents a greater ability to detect and respond to illegal cross-border entries.

CBP utilizes a comprehensive approach to border security that leverages local, state, and federal law enforcement partners and use of technology, infrastructure, and enforcement personnel to secure the Southwest border. The border wall is one element of CBP’s approach to border security.

The waiver allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to waive some legal requirements as the Secretary deems necessary to construct barriers and roads to deter illegal entry into the United States.

The Secretary’s waiver authority is derived from Section 102(c) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, as amended (“IIRIRA”), an authority granted to the Secretary by Congress.

The waiver includes various environmental, natural resource, and land management laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

No, the waiver does not impact the process required for the acquisition of private property.

Yes, CBP considers public input throughout the environmental review and construction design processes on all border infrastructure projects. The first opportunity for public input is during the scoping phase for environmental impacts. CBP solicits information from the public on the presence and characteristics of sensitive resources and potential physical, biological, and cultural impacts. Following the evaluation of impacts, CBP releases an Environmental Stewardship Plan (for projects that are waived from environmental laws) or an Environmental Assessment (for projects without a waiver). In addition, throughout design and construction phases, CBP consults directly with affected landowners.

CBP works closely with the Department of the Interior’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and other federal, state and non-governmental organizations to identify potential impacts to wildlife and habitats. To the greatest extent practicable, CBP will incorporate design considerations to avoid, minimize, or mitigate any potential impacts that are found. CBP regularly completes assessments of possible impacts to wildlife for its border infrastructure projects and is in the process of evaluating potential impacts to wildlife from its Fiscal Year 2018 Levee/Border Wall System projects.