--
Hey👋,
I’m working on an application that uses react-simple-maps. I need to fetch datas from an endpoint and I wanted to create a custom hook to fetch it, but after googling I saw other solutions — one that uses useLoaderData.
Which approach is the best?
The best practice depends on your specific project requirements, performance goals, and trade-offs you’re willing to make.
Let me clarify.
If you’re fetching data client-side, you can directly use the useFetchData hook to fetch data within the component and manage loading and error states internally, as demonstrated in the previous code snippet.
So, if you’re not using SSR and you’re fetching data client-side, you can indeed directly use the useFetchData hook instead of useLoaderData.
However, if you’re using SSR and need to pre-fetch data on the server before rendering the component on the client, you might still need a loader or an approach to fetch data during server-side rendering.
The useLoaderData hook in the react-router-dom library is typically used for server-side rendering (SSR) scenarios, where you need to load data on the server before rendering the component on the client.
Which one?
🌟Client-Side Data Fetching:
Advantages:
- Better user experience: With client-side data fetching, your application can load faster since the initial HTML is sent to the client quickly, and data is fetched asynchronously.
- Simpler server logic: Your server can focus solely on serving static assets and handling API requests rather than generating dynamic content for each request.
- Easier caching: You can leverage client-side caching mechanisms like browser caching and service workers for better performance.
Considerations:
- SEO: Client-side rendered content might not be as easily indexed by search engines compared to SSR.
- Initial load time: Depending on the amount of data fetched and the user’s network connection, there might be a delay in displaying content to the user.
- Handling loading states: You need to manage loading states and user experience during data fetching.
🌟Server-Side Rendering (SSR):
Advantages:
- SEO-friendly: SSR provides pre-rendered HTML content, which is more easily indexed by search engines since it’s present in the initial page load.
- Faster perceived performance: SSR can improve perceived performance since users see content sooner, especially on slower connections.
- Accessibility: SSR can improve accessibility since content is available immediately, even if JavaScript fails to load.
Considerations:
- More complex server logic: SSR requires more server-side processing and might involve additional server resources.
- Caching challenges: SSR caching can be more complex compared to client-side caching, especially for dynamic content.
- Scalability concerns: SSR might be more resource-intensive, especially under heavy traffic loads.
🌟Best Practice:
- For applications where SEO is critical and initial load time is important, SSR is often preferred.
- For highly interactive applications where user experience and fast loading are prioritized, client-side data fetching is a common choice.
- In many cases, a hybrid approach is used, where critical pages are rendered server-side for SEO purposes, while less critical or highly interactive pages fetch data client-side.
Thank you for your time 🧸.
