- Journal List
- J Korean Med Sci
- v.29(10); 2014 Oct
- PMC4214936
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Oct; 29(10): 1367–1371.
Published online 2014 Oct 8. doi:10.3346/jkms.2014.29.10.1367
PMCID: PMC4214936
PMID: 25368489
Semie Hong,1 Kyungjin Kim,2 Sejoung Yoon,2 Woo-Yoon Park,3 Seobo Sim,2 and Jae-Ran Yu
2
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
Abstract
Cryptosporidium parvum is a zoonotic protozoan parasite that causes cryptosporidial enteritis. Numerous outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis have been reported worldwide. Cryptosporidium is transmitted to hosts via consumption of contaminated water and food but also by direct contact with contaminated soil or infected hosts. The present study investigated farm soil collected from 34 locations along the western Korean peninsula and 24 vegetables purchased from local grocery markets in Seoul. The soil and vegetable samples were examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to estimate the risk of infection. Eleven of 34 locations (32.4%) and 3 of 24 vegetable samples (12.5%) were contaminated with Cryptosporidium parvum, as confirmed by TaqI enzyme digestion of qPCR products and DNA sequencing. It is suggested that Cryptosporidium infection can be mediated via farm soil and vegetables. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce contamination of this organism in view of public health.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords: Cryptosporidium parvum, Soil, Vegetables
INTRODUCTION
Cryptosporidium parvum is a protozoan parasite that causes cryptosporidiosis which is characterized by enteritis of watery diarrhea. Being a zoonotic disease, it can be transmitted between humans and animals. Numerous cryptosporidial enteritis outbreaks have been reported worldwide (1, 2, 3). In Korea, the first waterborne outbreak of cryptosporidiosis was reported in 2013 (4). Both humans and animals may be exposed to C. parvum through consumption of contaminated water and food as well as by direct contact with contaminated soil and infected hosts (5). C. parvum is released into the environment through the fecal matter of infected hosts in the form of oocysts and it remains potentially infectious for several months depending upon the environmental conditions and stresses (5). Application of manure and irrigation to agricultural fields with untreated effluent may also contribute to the prevalence of C. parvum oocysts in the farm environment (6).
Foodborne outbreaks are often not characterized as well as waterborne outbreaks (7). In the last decade, only 15 of 71 worldwide Cryptosporidium-linked outbreaks appeared to be correlated to transmission through food (8). Contaminated irrigation water appears to constitute a major route of contamination of fresh products (9). In addition, soil contaminated by manure could also be a source for contamination. There has been no report of foodborne outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in Korea until date. Additionally, little information is available regarding the contamination of soil or fresh produce by Cryptosporidium sp. in Korea. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the extent of contamination by Cryptosporidium of both farm soil and vegetables to determine the source and route of Cryptosporidium infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection and pretreatment
Soil samples were collected from 7 different localities along the western part of the Korean peninsula in January 2012 (Fig. 1). Soil (20 g) taken from each locality was mixed with 500 mL of filtered (0.22 µm) distilled water and centrifuged at 2,000×g for 20 min in an ultracentrifuge (Sorvall®Plus, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) after sieving through a gauze. The pellet was transferred to a 50-mL tube, washed in distilled water, and centrifuged again at 2,000×g for 20 min. The supernatant was discarded and 40 mL of distilled water was added to the pellet and mixed well. Only 1 mL of the mixed solution was taken and transferred into a microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 2,000×g for 10 min in a microcentrifuge (5415R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The pellet was collected and stored at 4℃ until the DNA was purified.
Fig. 1
Locations of the surveyed areas. (a) Hwaseong-si, (b) Seosan-si, (c) Hongsung-gun, (d) Boryeong-si, (e) Seocheon-gun, (f) Gunsan-si, (g) Buan-gun.
Domestic food products were purchased from a local grocery market in Seoul in June 2012. Fifty grams of fresh leafy vegetables (including spinach, wild sesame leaves, and winter-grown cabbage), fruits (including blueberries, wild berries, and cherry tomatoes), and one each of root vegetables (potatoes and carrots) were put into zipper bags (Cleanwrap Inc., Gimhae, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea). Next, 2-3 volumes of 0.1% liquinox™ (Alconox Inc., White plains, NY, USA) in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) was added to the bag; the bags were sealed tightly and placed on an orbital shaker (Hoefer, Holliston, MA, USA) for 15 min. The sample bags were then manually shaken repeatedly in an upside-down manner. The wash solution from the bag was collected in a bottle and centrifuged at 5,000×g for 20 min in an ultracentrifuge (Thermo Scientific). The supernatant was discarded. The food samples in the zipper bags were rewashed with 0.01 M PBS for 15 min, and the wash solution was centrifuged as before. After centrifugation, the pellets were transferred to 50-mL tubes and centrifuged at 1,000×g for 20 min in a centrifuge (Union 32R plus, Hanil Science Industrial, Incheon, Korea). Finally, the pellets were collected in microcentrifuge tubes. Cryptosporidium oocysts were isolated by using the Dynabeads® anti-Cryptosporidium kit (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was extracted from the soil and food samples by using the QIA-quick stool mini kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) (10).
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
The extracted DNA was used as a template in real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). To obtain Cryptosporidium DNA as a positive control, C. parvum oocysts (KKU isolates) were isolated from laboratory mice (C57BL6/J) as described by Lee et al. (11). C. hominis DNA obtained from human feces (12) was used as the positive control. The primers and probes used in qPCR were designed based on the gene sequences of C. parvumSWI2/SNF2 ATPase, a Rad16 ortholog gene (Rad16, GenBank no. XM_625623.1; Table 1). Absolute quantitative qPCR reactions were performed as per the method described by Lee et al. (11). The results were analyzed using the LightCycler® software (version 4.05; Roche). DNase/RNase-free water was used instead of the template DNA as a negative control. The plasmid DNA standard for qPCR was prepared as described previously using Rad 16 as the target gene (11).
Table 1
Primers and probes used for qPCR. Target gene was C. parvumSWI2/SNF2 ATPase, Rad16 ortholog gene (GenBank No. XM_625623)
Open in a separate window
Sequences of qPCR products were confirmed using the ABI 7700 Sequence Detector and SDS software (version 1.6.3; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at the Cosmo Sequence Facility Service (Seoul, Korea). The gene sequences were aligned using Clone ManagerSuite 7 (Sci-Ed Software, Cary, NC, USA). To differentiate Cryptosporidium sp. by using the restriction enzyme fragmentation method, the qPCR products were digested with TaqI restriction enzyme (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) at 65℃ for 2 hr, and the DNA fragments were analyzed on 2% agarose gel.
RESULTS
Of the 34 farm soil samples examined, Cryptosporidium sp. was detected in 11 soil samples (Table 2; 32.4% positive). The number of oocysts detected from the soil samples ranged 809-3,710/g of soil. In Hongseong-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, 6 of the 7 soil samples were positive for Cryptosporidium sp., which was the highest positive rate (85.7%) among the areas examined (except for Gyeonggi-do, where only one sample was examined). In the two locations in Jeollabuk-do, Cryptosporidium was not detected. Agarose gel electrophoresis demonstrated the presence of a 242-bp product in all Cryptosporidium-positive samples (Fig. 2A). The result of TaqI restriction enzyme digestion showed that all of the positive samples fragmented into 117- and 125-bp bands (Fig. 2B). The C. parvum DNA used as a positive control showed fragmented bands with same pattern as that of the Cryptosporidium-positive soil samples. C. hominis DNA, obtained from human diarrheal stool (12), was not fragmented by the TaqI enzyme (Fig. 2B). DNA sequence alignment data of the PCR products showed 98%-100% hom*ology with those of C. parvum (Fig. 4A). Thus, Cryptosporidium sp. detected from the 11 soil samples were confirmed to be C. parvum.
Fig. 2
Agarose gel electrophoresis of the qPCR products from soil samples. qPCR was performed to detect Cryptosporidium parvumSWI2/SNF2 ATPase, a Rad16 ortholog gene (GenBank No. XM_625623). (A) qPCR products of soil samples (242 bp). (B) DNA fragments generated from TaqI enzyme digests of the qPCR products. L, 100-bp ladder; ① soils from Hwaseong-si, ② Seosan-si, ③-⑧ Hongseong-gun, ⑨-⑩ Boryeong-si, ⑪ Seocheon-si; Cp, C. parvum DNA; Ch, C. hominis DNA.
Fig. 4
Alignment of the qPCR product sequences belonging to the positive soil (A) and food (B) samples generated by using the Clone Manager 7. qPCR was performed to detect C. parvumSWI2/SNF2 ATPase, Rad16 ortholog gene (GenBank No. XM_625623).
Table 2
Positive rates of Cryptosporidium detection in soil samples according to the sample collection site
Open in a separate window
Of the 24 food samples examined, Cryptosporidium sp. was detected from 3 food samples of carrot, winter-grown cabbage, and blueberries (12.5% positive) (Table 3). Cryptosporidium sp. was detected in only 1 of 3 samples for each kind of food examined (Table 3). The number of oocysts detected from the food samples was 42-110/g of the sample. Agarose gel electrophoresis revealed a 242-bp product from all Cryptosporidium-positive samples (Fig. 3A), and TaqI restriction enzyme digest revealed that all positive samples had fragmented into 117- and 125-bp bands (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that the food samples were contaminated with C. parvum. DNA sequence alignment data of the PCR products also supported that the Cryptosporidium sp. detected from the food samples was C. parvum (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 3
Agarose gel electrophoresis of the qPCR products from food samples. qPCR was performed to detect the C. parvumSWI2/SNF2 ATPase, Rad16 ortholog gene (GenBank No. XM_625623). (A) qPCR products of food samples (242 bp). (B) DNA fragments generated by TaqI enzyme digestion of the qPCR products. L, 100-bp ladder; 1, carrot; 2, winter-grown cabbage; 3, blueberry; Cp, C. parvum DNA.
Table 3
Positive rates of Cryptosporidium detection in food samples according to the sample collection sites
Open in a separate window
DISCUSSION
Cryptosporidiosis is one of the most prevalent waterborne parasitic infections (1). Cryptosporidium is a zoonotic pathogen, and the sources of zoonotic contamination are usually feces-contaminated soil and water. In addition, food can mediate human infection by contamination from irrigation water and soil. The recent increase in the demand, global sourcing, and rapid transport of food products, especially of soft fruit and salad vegetables, enhances both the likelihood of surface contamination and the survival of pathogenic parasites in transmissive stages (13).
Recently, Dado et al. (14) reported that 6% of examined park soils in Madrid, Spain were contaminated with Cryptosporidium sp. and they indicated that children are mainly affected by accidental ingestion of contaminated soil. Farm soil presents an additional source of infection due to microbial pathogen contamination from agricultural runoff contaminated with livestock feces. In the present study, C. parvum was detected in 11 of the 34 (32%) farm soils examined. Animal husbandry in the vicinity of the sampling sites could be an important factor influencing the results of this study, as Cryptosporidium-positive farm areas were located near areas where animal husbandry was practiced. In addition, animal husbandry was not practiced around the farms of Jeollabuk-do, where no oocysts were detected. Cryptosporidium infection rates of cattle, goats, pigs, and livestock in some rural areas of Korea have been reported to range from 10% to 94% in 2004 and 2006 (15, 16, 17), suggesting that the source of soil contamination with Cryptosporidium oocysts could be livestock feces. Livestock studies on Cryptosporidium infection were performed in different locations in the present study, such as Jeollanam-do and Chungcheongbuk-do. In only one locality (Hongseong-gun, Chungcheongnam-do), it was reported that 1% of pigs was infected with Cryptosporidium in 2004 (15), and where 85.7% of soil samples were contaminated in 2012. This difference could be due to the difference in the soil collected from the sample site, indicating several changes in the agricultural environment in the last 10 yr in the same area.
There have been reports on foodborne cryptosporidiosis from the USA, UK, and Nordic countries (18). Cryptosporidium oocysts have been detected in several sources of fruits, salad vegetables, oysters, mussels, water spinach, and zucchini (19, 20, 21, 22, 23). Vegetables such as cilantro leaves, lettuce, carrots, and mung bean sprouts sold in the markets of Costa Rica and Norway have also been reported to be contaminated with Cryptosporidium oocysts (24, 25). In the present study, we identified Cryptosporidium sp. from carrot, winter-grown cabbage, and blueberries, and confirmed the species to be C. parvum by using a molecular genetics method. Most of the earlier studies were unable to identify the infectious Cryptosporidium sp. because of the limitations of the conventional detection systems and use of acid-fast staining or fluorescent antibody labeling techniques for confirmatory identification. Although the viability and infectivity of the detected oocysts could not be determined in this study, it is necessary to develop a washing manual for food safety practices. A previous report showed that the infective dose (ID50) for Cryptosporidium was as low as 9 oocysts (26).
Presently, there are no commonly agreed-upon guidelines to assess the methods used to detect parasitic protozoa on farm products (27). Cook et al. (28, 29) conducted extensive studies by examining a number of wash solutions and washing techniques for vegetables. The use of Alconox® for washing food samples has been reported to significantly increase the recovery efficiencies (27). Therefore, in the present study, we combined the methods described by Cook et al. (29) and Shields et al. (27) for washing the vegetables.
This study has a limitation of smaller sample size in terms of the numbers of food samples and sample sites for adequately representing the overall status of soil and food contamination in Korea. Nevertheless, this study provides valuable information about soil contamination by Cryptosporidium in Korea for the first time as well as supports the hypothesis that contaminated farm soil could be a source of contamination of farm products. Although there have been no reports of foodborne outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis in Korea yet, the results of this study indicate the potential risk of such an occurrence. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct epidemiological study on a large scale with sufficient soil and food samples on Cryptosporidium contamination in the future.
Footnotes
This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011-3333702).
The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.
References
1. Baldursson S, Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks - an update 2004-2010. Water Res. 2011;45:6603–6614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Mac Kenzie WR, Hoxie NJ, Proctor ME, Gradus MS, Blair KA, Peterson DE, Kazmierczak JJ, Addiss DG, Fox KR, Rose JB, et al. A massive outbreak in Milwaukee of cryptosporidium infection transmitted through the public water supply. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:161–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Smith HV, Rose JB. Waterborne cryptosporidiosis: current status. Parasitol Today. 1998;14:14–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Moon S, Kwak W, Lee S, Kim W, Oh J, Youn SK. Epidemiological characteristics of the first water-borne outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in Seoul, Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28:983–989. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Fayer R. Cryptosporidium: a water-borne zoonotic parasite. Vet Parasitol. 2004;126:37–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Zilberman A, Zimmels Y, Starosvetsky J, Zuckerman U, Armon R. A two-phase separation method for recovery of Cryptosporidium oocysts from soil samples. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009;203:325–334. [Google Scholar]
7. Petersen HH, Enemark HL, Olsen A, Amin MG, Dalsgaard A. Transport of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in soil columns following applications of raw and separated liquid slurries. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:5994–6000. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Putignani L, Menichella D. Global distribution, public health and clinical impact of the protozoan pathogen cryptosporidium. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2010;2010:pii: 753512. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Chaidez C, Soto M, Gortares P, Mena K. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in irrigation water and its impact on the fresh produce industry. Int J Environ Health Res. 2005;15:339–345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Shields JM, Joo J, Kim R, Murphy HR. Assessment of three commercial DNA extraction kits and a laboratory-developed method for detecting Cryptosporidium and Cyclospora in raspberry wash, basil wash and pesto. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;92:51–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Lee SU, Joung M, Ahn MH, Huh S, Song H, Park WY, Yu JR. CP2 gene as a useful viability marker for Cryptosporidium parvum. Parasitol Res. 2008;102:381–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Cheun HI, Kim K, Yoon S, Lee WJ, Park WY, Sim S, Yu JR. Cryptosporidium hominis infection diagnosed by real-time PCR-RFLP. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51:353–355. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Slifko TR, Smith HV, Rose JB. Emerging parasite zoonoses associated with water and food. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1379–1393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Dado D, Izquierdo F, Vera O, Montoya A, Mateo M, Fenoy S, Galván AL, García S, García A, Aránguez E, et al. Detection of zoonotic intestinal parasites in public parks of Spain. Potential epidemiological role of microsporidia. Zoonoses Public Health. 2012;59:23–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Yu JR, Seo M. Infection status of pigs with Cryptosporidium parvum. Korean J Parasitol. 2004;42:45–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Yu JR, Lee JK, Seo M, Kim SI, Sohn WM, Huh S, Choi HY, Kim TS. Prevalence of cryptosporidiosis among the villagers and domestic animals in several rural areas of Korea. Korean J Parasitol. 2004;42:1–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Park JH, Guk SM, Han ET, Shin EH, Kim JL, Chai JY. Genotype analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. prevalent in a rural village in Hwasun-gun, Republic of Korea. Korean J Parasitol. 2006;44:27–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Robertson LJ, Chalmers RM. Foodborne cryptosporidiosis: is there really more in Nordic countries? Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Smith HV, Cacciò S, Cook N, Nichols RA, Tait A. Cryptosporidium and Giardia as foodborne zoonoses. Vet Parasitol. 2007;149:29–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Vuong TA, Nguyen TT, Klank LT, Phung DC, Dalsgaard A. Faecal and protozoan parasite contamination of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) cultivated in urban wastewater in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:73–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Schets FM, van den Berg HH, Engels GB, Lodder WJ, de Roda Husman AM. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in commercial and non-commercial oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and water from the Oosterschelde, The Netherlands. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;113:189–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Amorós I, Alonso JL, Cuesta G. Cryptosporidium oocysts and giardia cysts on salad products irrigated with contaminated water. J Food Prot. 2010;73:1138–1140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Armon R, Gold D, Brodsky M, Oron G. Surface and subsurface irrigation with effluents of different qualities and presence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in soil and on crops. Water Sci Technol. 2002;46:115–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Robertson LJ, Gjerde B. Occurrence of parasites on fruits and vegetables in Norway. J Food Prot. 2001;64:1793–1798. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Monge R, Arias ML. Presence of various pathogenic microorganisms in fresh vegetables in Costa Rica. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1996;46:292–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Okhuysen PC, Chappell CL, Crabb JH, Sterling CR, DuPont HL. Virulence of three distinct Cryptosporidium parvum isolates for healthy adults. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1275–1281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Shields JM, Lee MM, Murphy HR. Use of a common laboratory glassware detergent improves recovery of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis from lettuce, herbs and raspberries. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;153:123–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Cook N, Paton CA, Wilkinson N, Nichols RA, Barker K, Smith HV. Towards standard methods for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum on lettuce and raspberries. Part 1: development and optimization of methods. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;109:215–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Cook N, Paton CA, Wilkinson N, Nichols RA, Barker K, Smith HV. Towards standard methods for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum on lettuce and raspberries. Part 2: validation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;109:222–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Journal of Korean Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
