Flexense - Data Management Software (2024)

The purpose of this review is to compare the performance of file copy operations using the Windows built-in command line file copy utilities Robocopy and XCopy. The performance test was performed on a quad-core machine with 16 GB of system memory running the Windows Server 2012 operating system. The file copy operations were performed between two identical Crucial MX300 1TB SSD drives using the same data set containing 30,000 small and medium-sized files.

Performance CounterRobocopyXCopy
Disk Transfer RateFlexense - Data Management Software (3) 128.48 MB/SecFlexense - Data Management Software (4) 121.06 MB/Sec
Disk Read TransferFlexense - Data Management Software (5) 75.28 MB/SecFlexense - Data Management Software (6) 76.15 MB/Sec
Disk Write TransferFlexense - Data Management Software (7) 50.30 MB/SecFlexense - Data Management Software (8) 43.76 MB/Sec
Disk Transfer IOPSFlexense - Data Management Software (9) 3701.72 IOPSFlexense - Data Management Software (10) 2860.24 IOPS
Disk Read IOPSFlexense - Data Management Software (11) 2208.20 IOPSFlexense - Data Management Software (12) 1922.44 IOPS
Disk Write IOPSFlexense - Data Management Software (13) 973.50 IOPSFlexense - Data Management Software (14) 927.73 IOPS
Disk Average Request SizeFlexense - Data Management Software (15) 43.47 KBFlexense - Data Management Software (16) 55.52 KB
Disk Average Read Request SizeFlexense - Data Management Software (17) 44.61 KBFlexense - Data Management Software (18) 49.08 KB
Disk Average Write Request SizeFlexense - Data Management Software (19) 81.40 KBFlexense - Data Management Software (20) 67.74 KB
Disk Average Request TimeFlexense - Data Management Software (21) 0.59 ms.Flexense - Data Management Software (22) 0.32 ms.
Disk Average Read Request TimeFlexense - Data Management Software (23) 0.36 ms.Flexense - Data Management Software (24) 0.21 ms.
Disk Average Write Request TimeFlexense - Data Management Software (25) 0.51 ms.Flexense - Data Management Software (26) 0.52 ms.
CPU UsageFlexense - Data Management Software (27) 14.82 %Flexense - Data Management Software (28) 16.76 %
CPU Usage SystemFlexense - Data Management Software (29) 13.65 %Flexense - Data Management Software (30) 14.12 %
Process CPU UsageFlexense - Data Management Software (31) 51.31 %Flexense - Data Management Software (32) 56.75 %
Process Memory UsedFlexense - Data Management Software (33) 5.41 MBFlexense - Data Management Software (34) 3.93 MB
Process Data RateFlexense - Data Management Software (35) 151.02 MB/SecFlexense - Data Management Software (36) 160.40 MB/Sec
Process Data IOPSFlexense - Data Management Software (37) 5026.04 IOPSFlexense - Data Management Software (38) 5331.92 IOPS

According to the performance results, Robocopy achieves better results in 10 out of 18 tests including: Disk Transfer Rate, Disk Write Transfer, Disk Transfer IOPS, Disk Read IOPS, Disk Write IOPS, Disk Average Write Request Size, Disk Average Write Request Time, CPU Usage, CPU Usage System and Process CPU Usage. On the other hand, XCopy achieves better results in 8 out of 18 tests including: Disk Read Transfer, Disk Average Request Size, Disk Average Read Request Size, Disk Average Request Time, Disk Average Read Request Time, Process Memory Used, Process Data Rate and Process Data IOPS.

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Transfer Rate

Flexense - Data Management Software (39) Robocopy128.48 MB/Sec
Flexense - Data Management Software (40) XCopy121.06 MB/Sec
More is BetterAverage: 124.77 MB/SecMin: 0.00 MB/SecMax: 312.22 MB/Sec

The average Disk Transfer Rate is better for Robocopy (128.48 MB/Sec vs. 121.06 MB/Sec), the minimum Disk Transfer Rate is better for Robocopy (23.52 MB/Sec vs. 0.00 MB/Sec) and the maximum Disk Transfer Rate is better for Robocopy (312.22 MB/Sec vs. 283.57 MB/Sec).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Read Transfer

Flexense - Data Management Software (41) Robocopy75.28 MB/Sec
Flexense - Data Management Software (42) XCopy76.15 MB/Sec
More is BetterAverage: 75.72 MB/SecMin: 0.00 MB/SecMax: 218.24 MB/Sec

The average Disk Read Transfer is better for XCopy (76.15 MB/Sec vs. 75.28 MB/Sec), the minimum Disk Read Transfer is better for Robocopy (4.74 MB/Sec vs. 0.00 MB/Sec) and the maximum Disk Read Transfer is better for XCopy (218.24 MB/Sec vs. 213.22 MB/Sec).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Write Transfer

Flexense - Data Management Software (43) Robocopy50.30 MB/Sec
Flexense - Data Management Software (44) XCopy43.76 MB/Sec
More is BetterAverage: 47.03 MB/SecMin: 0.00 MB/SecMax: 133.27 MB/Sec

The average Disk Write Transfer is better for Robocopy (50.30 MB/Sec vs. 43.76 MB/Sec), the minimum Disk Write Transfer is better for Robocopy (0.39 MB/Sec vs. 0.00 MB/Sec) and the maximum Disk Write Transfer is better for XCopy (133.27 MB/Sec vs. 113.15 MB/Sec).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Transfer IOPS

Flexense - Data Management Software (45) Robocopy3701.72 IOPS
Flexense - Data Management Software (46) XCopy2860.24 IOPS
More is BetterAverage: 3280.98 IOPSMin: 0.00 IOPSMax: 8389.53 IOPS

The average Disk Transfer IOPS is better for Robocopy (3701.72 IOPS vs. 2860.24 IOPS), the minimum Disk Transfer IOPS is better for Robocopy (1166.57 IOPS vs. 0.00 IOPS) and the maximum Disk Transfer IOPS is better for XCopy (8389.53 IOPS vs. 7124.81 IOPS).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Read IOPS

Flexense - Data Management Software (47) Robocopy2208.20 IOPS
Flexense - Data Management Software (48) XCopy1922.44 IOPS
More is BetterAverage: 2065.32 IOPSMin: 0.00 IOPSMax: 3074.95 IOPS

The average Disk Read IOPS is better for Robocopy (2208.20 IOPS vs. 1922.44 IOPS), the minimum Disk Read IOPS is better for Robocopy (429.46 IOPS vs. 0.00 IOPS) and the maximum Disk Read IOPS is better for Robocopy (3074.95 IOPS vs. 2762.62 IOPS).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Write IOPS

Flexense - Data Management Software (49) Robocopy973.50 IOPS
Flexense - Data Management Software (50) XCopy927.73 IOPS
More is BetterAverage: 950.62 IOPSMin: 0.00 IOPSMax: 7899.08 IOPS

The average Disk Write IOPS is better for Robocopy (973.50 IOPS vs. 927.73 IOPS), the minimum Disk Write IOPS is better for Robocopy (29.51 IOPS vs. 0.00 IOPS) and the maximum Disk Write IOPS is better for XCopy (7899.08 IOPS vs. 5245.99 IOPS).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Average Request Size

Flexense - Data Management Software (51) Robocopy43.47 KB
Flexense - Data Management Software (52) XCopy55.52 KB
More is BetterAverage: 49.50 KBMin: 0.00 KBMax: 202.50 KB

The average Disk Average Request Size is better for XCopy (55.52 KB vs. 43.47 KB), the minimum Disk Average Request Size is better for Robocopy (6.04 KB vs. 0.00 KB) and the maximum Disk Average Request Size is better for XCopy (202.50 KB vs. 107.99 KB).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Average Read Request Size

Flexense - Data Management Software (53) Robocopy44.61 KB
Flexense - Data Management Software (54) XCopy49.08 KB
More is BetterAverage: 46.84 KBMin: 0.00 KBMax: 229.89 KB

The average Disk Average Read Request Size is better for XCopy (49.08 KB vs. 44.61 KB), the minimum Disk Average Read Request Size is better for Robocopy (6.47 KB vs. 0.00 KB) and the maximum Disk Average Read Request Size is better for XCopy (229.89 KB vs. 157.34 KB).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Average Write Request Size

Flexense - Data Management Software (55) Robocopy81.40 KB
Flexense - Data Management Software (56) XCopy67.74 KB
More is BetterAverage: 74.57 KBMin: 0.00 KBMax: 250.56 KB

The average Disk Average Write Request Size is better for Robocopy (81.40 KB vs. 67.74 KB), the minimum Disk Average Write Request Size is better for Robocopy (4.00 KB vs. 0.00 KB) and the maximum Disk Average Write Request Size is better for Robocopy (250.56 KB vs. 203.68 KB).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Average Request Time

Flexense - Data Management Software (57) Robocopy0.59 ms.
Flexense - Data Management Software (58) XCopy0.32 ms.
Less is BetterAverage: 0.45 ms.Min: 0.00 ms.Max: 2.62 ms.

The average Disk Average Request Time is better for XCopy (0.32 ms. vs. 0.59 ms.), the minimum Disk Average Request Time is better for XCopy (0.00 ms. vs. 0.10 ms.) and the maximum Disk Average Request Time is better for XCopy (1.36 ms. vs. 2.62 ms.).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Average Read Request Time

Flexense - Data Management Software (59) Robocopy0.36 ms.
Flexense - Data Management Software (60) XCopy0.21 ms.
Less is BetterAverage: 0.28 ms.Min: 0.00 ms.Max: 3.05 ms.

The average Disk Average Read Request Time is better for XCopy (0.21 ms. vs. 0.36 ms.), the minimum Disk Average Read Request Time is better for XCopy (0.00 ms. vs. 0.11 ms.) and the maximum Disk Average Read Request Time is better for XCopy (0.69 ms. vs. 3.05 ms.).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Disk Average Write Request Time

Flexense - Data Management Software (61) Robocopy0.51 ms.
Flexense - Data Management Software (62) XCopy0.52 ms.
Less is BetterAverage: 0.52 ms.Min: 0.00 ms.Max: 1.69 ms.

The average Disk Average Write Request Time is better for Robocopy (0.51 ms. vs. 0.52 ms.), the minimum Disk Average Write Request Time is better for XCopy (0.00 ms. vs. 0.03 ms.) and the maximum Disk Average Write Request Time is better for Robocopy (1.54 ms. vs. 1.69 ms.).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - CPU Usage

Flexense - Data Management Software (63) Robocopy14.82 %
Flexense - Data Management Software (64) XCopy16.76 %
Less is BetterAverage: 15.79 %Min: 0.00 %Max: 23.00 %

The average CPU Usage is better for Robocopy (14.82 % vs. 16.76 %), the minimum CPU Usage is better for XCopy (0.00 % vs. 7.00 %) and the maximum CPU Usage is better for Robocopy (21.00 % vs. 23.00 %).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - CPU Usage System

Flexense - Data Management Software (65) Robocopy13.65 %
Flexense - Data Management Software (66) XCopy14.12 %
Less is BetterAverage: 13.88 %Min: 0.00 %Max: 21.00 %

The average CPU Usage System is better for Robocopy (13.65 % vs. 14.12 %), the minimum CPU Usage System is better for XCopy (0.00 % vs. 7.00 %) and the maximum CPU Usage System is better for XCopy (19.00 % vs. 21.00 %).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Process CPU Usage

Flexense - Data Management Software (67) Robocopy51.31 %
Flexense - Data Management Software (68) XCopy56.75 %
Less is BetterAverage: 54.03 %Min: 28.57 %Max: 77.77 %

The average Process CPU Usage is better for Robocopy (51.31 % vs. 56.75 %), the minimum Process CPU Usage is better for Robocopy (28.57 % vs. 38.09 %) and the maximum Process CPU Usage is better for Robocopy (65.07 % vs. 77.77 %).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Process Memory Used

Flexense - Data Management Software (69) Robocopy5.41 MB
Flexense - Data Management Software (70) XCopy3.93 MB
Less is BetterAverage: 4.67 MBMin: 3.66 MBMax: 6.25 MB

The average Process Memory Used is better for XCopy (3.93 MB vs. 5.41 MB), the minimum Process Memory Used is better for XCopy (3.66 MB vs. 5.30 MB) and the maximum Process Memory Used is better for XCopy (4.18 MB vs. 6.25 MB).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Process Data Rate

Flexense - Data Management Software (71) Robocopy151.02 MB/Sec
Flexense - Data Management Software (72) XCopy160.40 MB/Sec
More is BetterAverage: 155.71 MB/SecMin: 28.07 MB/SecMax: 433.76 MB/Sec

The average Process Data Rate is better for XCopy (160.40 MB/Sec vs. 151.02 MB/Sec), the minimum Process Data Rate is better for XCopy (28.24 MB/Sec vs. 28.07 MB/Sec) and the maximum Process Data Rate is better for XCopy (433.76 MB/Sec vs. 423.57 MB/Sec).

Robocopy vs. XCopy - Process Data IOPS

Flexense - Data Management Software (73) Robocopy5026.04 IOPS
Flexense - Data Management Software (74) XCopy5331.92 IOPS
More is BetterAverage: 5178.98 IOPSMin: 4057.79 IOPSMax: 6063.62 IOPS

The average Process Data IOPS is better for XCopy (5331.92 IOPS vs. 5026.04 IOPS), the minimum Process Data IOPS is better for XCopy (4523.74 IOPS vs. 4057.79 IOPS) and the maximum Process Data IOPS is better for XCopy (6063.62 IOPS vs. 5862.42 IOPS).

Flexense - Data Management Software (2024)
Top Articles
Check which debts bankruptcy covers
Self-Inking vs. Pre-Inked Stamps
Kansas City Kansas Public Schools Educational Audiology Externship in Kansas City, KS for KCK public Schools
Napa Autocare Locator
Paris 2024: Kellie Harrington has 'no more mountains' as double Olympic champion retires
Google Sites Classroom 6X
Did 9Anime Rebrand
Google Jobs Denver
Hallowed Sepulchre Instances & More
Optum Medicare Support
Magic Mike's Last Dance Showtimes Near Marcus Cedar Creek Cinema
True Statement About A Crown Dependency Crossword
2013 Chevy Cruze Coolant Hose Diagram
Spelunking The Den Wow
Rapv Springfield Ma
Johnston v. State, 2023 MT 20
George The Animal Steele Gif
Current Time In Maryland
Transfer and Pay with Wells Fargo Online®
Jalapeno Grill Ponca City Menu
Pay Boot Barn Credit Card
Samantha Aufderheide
Touchless Car Wash Schaumburg
Somewhere In Queens Showtimes Near The Maple Theater
Deshuesadero El Pulpo
Everything To Know About N Scale Model Trains - My Hobby Models
Boxer Puppies For Sale In Amish Country Ohio
Craigslist Panama City Beach Fl Pets
Chicago Based Pizza Chain Familiarly
Maine Racer Swap And Sell
Kristy Ann Spillane
1964 Impala For Sale Craigslist
Imagetrend Elite Delaware
Have you seen this child? Caroline Victoria Teague
Reli Stocktwits
Personalised Handmade 50th, 60th, 70th, 80th Birthday Card, Sister, Mum, Friend | eBay
Grapes And Hops Festival Jamestown Ny
Mydocbill.com/Mr
Enjoy4Fun Uno
15 Best Things to Do in Roseville (CA) - The Crazy Tourist
All Obituaries | Sneath Strilchuk Funeral Services | Funeral Home Roblin Dauphin Ste Rose McCreary MB
UT Announces Physician Assistant Medicine Program
Dagelijkse hooikoortsradar: deze pollen zitten nu in de lucht
Sky Dental Cartersville
Wpne Tv Schedule
Dobratz Hantge Funeral Chapel Obituaries
UNC Charlotte Admission Requirements
Www.homedepot .Com
Maurices Thanks Crossword Clue
Myhrkohls.con
7 Sites to Identify the Owner of a Phone Number
Secondary Math 2 Module 3 Answers
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Foster Heidenreich CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 6353

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Foster Heidenreich CPA

Birthday: 1995-01-14

Address: 55021 Usha Garden, North Larisa, DE 19209

Phone: +6812240846623

Job: Corporate Healthcare Strategist

Hobby: Singing, Listening to music, Rafting, LARPing, Gardening, Quilting, Rappelling

Introduction: My name is Foster Heidenreich CPA, I am a delightful, quaint, glorious, quaint, faithful, enchanting, fine person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.