Integration Testing - Software Engineering - GeeksforGeeks (2024)

Last Updated : 30 Jul, 2024

Summarize

Comments

Improve

Integration testing is the process of testing the interface between two software units or modules. It focuses on determining the correctness of the interface. The purpose of integration testing is to expose faults in the interaction between integrated units. Once all the modules have been unit-tested, integration testing is performed.

Table of Content

  • What is Integration Testing?
  • Why is Integration Testing Important?
  • Integration test approaches
  • Applications of Integration Testing
  • Test Cases For Integration Testing
  • Difference between Manual Testing and Automated Testing
  • Unit Testing vs Integration Testing
  • Conclusion
  • Frequently Asked Questions on Integration Testing

What is Integration Testing?

Integration testing is a software testing technique that focuses on verifying the interactions and data exchange between different components or modules of a software application. The goal of integration testing is to identify any problems or bugs that arise when different components are combined and interact with each other. Integration testing is typically performed after unit testing and before system testing. It helps to identify and resolve integration issues early in the development cycle, reducing the risk of more severe and costly problems later on.

Integration testing is one of the basic type of software testing and there are many other basic and advance software testing. If you are interested in learning all the testing concept and other more advance concept in the field of the software testing you can checkout our course

Integration Testing - Software Engineering - GeeksforGeeks (1)

Integration Testing

  • Integration testing can be done by picking module by module. This can be done so that there should be a proper sequence to be followed.
  • And also if you don’t want to miss out on any integration scenarios then you have to follow the proper sequence.
  • Exposing the defects is the major focus of the integration testing and the time of interaction between the integrated units.

Prerequisite – Software Testing | Basics , Types of Software Testing

Why is Integration Testing Important?

Integration testing is important because it verifies that individual software modules or components work together correctly as a whole system. This ensures that the integrated software functions as intended and helps identify any compatibility or communication issues between different parts of the system. By detecting and resolving integration problems early, integration testing contributes to the overall reliability, performance, and quality of the software product.

Integration test approaches

There are four types of integration testing approaches. Those approaches are the following:

Integration Testing - Software Engineering - GeeksforGeeks (2)

Integration test approaches

1. Big-Bang Integration Testing

  • It is the simplest integration testing approach, where all the modules are combined and the functionality is verified after the completion of individual module testing.
  • In simple words, all the modules of the system are simply put together and tested.
  • This approach is practicable only for very small systems. If an error is found during the integration testing, it is very difficult to localize the error as the error may potentially belong to any of the modules being integrated.
  • So, debugging errors reported during Big Bang integration testing is very expensive to fix.
  • Big-bang integration testing is a software testing approach in which all components or modules of a software application are combined and tested at once.
  • This approach is typically used when the software components have a low degree of interdependence or when there are constraints in the development environment that prevent testing individual components.
  • The goal of big-bang integration testing is to verify the overall functionality of the system and to identify any integration problems that arise when the components are combined.
  • While big-bang integration testing can be useful in some situations, it can also be a high-risk approach, as the complexity of the system and the number of interactions between components can make it difficult to identify and diagnose problems.

Advantages of Big-Bang Integration Testing

  • It is convenient for small systems.
  • Simple and straightforward approach.
  • Can be completed quickly.
  • Does not require a lot of planning or coordination.
  • May be suitable for small systems or projects with a low degree of interdependence between components.

Disadvantages of Big-Bang Integration Testing

  • There will be quite a lot of delay because you would have to wait for all the modules to be integrated.
  • High-risk critical modules are not isolated and tested on priority since all modules are tested at once.
  • Not Good for long projects.
  • High risk of integration problems that are difficult to identify and diagnose.
  • This can result in long and complex debugging and troubleshooting efforts.
  • This can lead to system downtime and increased development costs.
  • May not provide enough visibility into the interactions and data exchange between components.
  • This can result in a lack of confidence in the system’s stability and reliability.
  • This can lead to decreased efficiency and productivity.
  • This may result in a lack of confidence in the development team.
  • This can lead to system failure and decreased user satisfaction.

2. Bottom-Up Integration Testing

In bottom-up testing, each module at lower levels are tested with higher modules until all modules are tested. The primary purpose of this integration testing is that each subsystem tests the interfaces among various modules making up the subsystem. This integration testing uses test drivers to drive and pass appropriate data to the lower-level modules.

Advantages of Bottom-Up Integration Testing

  • In bottom-up testing, no stubs are required.
  • A principal advantage of this integration testing is that several disjoint subsystems can be tested simultaneously.
  • It is easy to create the test conditions.
  • Best for applications that uses bottom up design approach.
  • It is Easy to observe the test results.

Disadvantages of Bottom-Up Integration Testing

  • Driver modules must be produced.
  • In this testing, the complexity that occurs when the system is made up of a large number of small subsystems.
  • As Far modules have been created, there is no working model can be represented.

3. Top-Down Integration Testing

Top-down integration testing technique is used in order to simulate the behaviour of the lower-level modules that are not yet integrated. In this integration testing, testing takes place from top to bottom. First, high-level modules are tested and then low-level modules and finally integrating the low-level modules to a high level to ensure the system is working as intended.

Advantages of Top-Down Integration Testing

  • Separately debugged module.
  • Few or no drivers needed.
  • It is more stable and accurate at the aggregate level.
  • Easier isolation of interface errors.
  • In this, design defects can be found in the early stages.

Disadvantages of Top-Down Integration Testing

  • Needs many Stubs.
  • Modules at lower level are tested inadequately.
  • It is difficult to observe the test output.
  • It is difficult to stub design.

4. Mixed Integration Testing

A mixed integration testing is also called sandwiched integration testing. A mixed integration testing follows a combination of top down and bottom-up testing approaches. In top-down approach, testing can start only after the top-level module have been coded and unit tested. In bottom-up approach, testing can start only after the bottom level modules are ready. This sandwich or mixed approach overcomes this shortcoming of the top-down and bottom-up approaches. It is also called the hybrid integration testing. also, stubs and drivers are used in mixed integration testing.

Advantages of Mixed Integration Testing

  • Mixed approach is useful for very large projects having several sub projects.
  • This Sandwich approach overcomes this shortcoming of the top-down and bottom-up approaches.
  • Parallel test can be performed in top and bottom layer tests.

Disadvantages of Mixed Integration Testing

  • For mixed integration testing, it requires very high cost because one part has a Top-down approach while another part has a bottom-up approach.
  • This integration testing cannot be used for smaller systems with huge interdependence between different modules.

Applications of Integration Testing

  1. Identify the components: Identify the individual components of your application that need to be integrated. This could include the frontend, backend, database, and any third-party services.
  2. Create a test plan: Develop a test plan that outlines the scenarios and test cases that need to be executed to validate the integration points between the different components. This could include testing data flow, communication protocols, and error handling.
  3. Set up test environment: Set up a test environment that mirrors the production environment as closely as possible. This will help ensure that the results of your integration tests are accurate and reliable.
  4. Execute the tests: Execute the tests outlined in your test plan, starting with the most critical and complex scenarios. Be sure to log any defects or issues that you encounter during testing.
  5. Analyze the results: Analyze the results of your integration tests to identify any defects or issues that need to be addressed. This may involve working with developers to fix bugs or make changes to the application architecture.
  6. Repeat testing: Once defects have been fixed, repeat the integration testing process to ensure that the changes have been successful and that the application still works as expected.

Test Cases For Integration Testing

  • Interface Testing : Verify that data exchange between modules occurs correctly. Validate input/output parameters and formats. Ensure proper error handling and exception propagation between modules.
  • Functional Flow Testing : Test end-to-end functionality by simulating user interactions. Verify that user inputs are processed correctly and produce expected outputs. Ensure seamless flow of data and control between modules.
  • Data Integration Testing : Validate data integrity and consistency across different modules. Test data transformation and conversion between formats. Verify proper handling of edge cases and boundary conditions.
  • Dependency Testing : Test interactions between dependent modules. Verify that changes in one module do not adversely affect others. Ensure proper synchronization and communication between modules.
  • Error Handling Testing : Validate error detection and reporting mechanisms. Test error recovery and fault tolerance capabilities. Ensure that error messages are clear and informative.
  • Performance Testing : Measure system performance under integrated conditions. Test response times, throughput, and resource utilization. Verify scalability and concurrency handling between modules.
  • Security Testing : Test access controls and permissions between integrated modules. Verify encryption and data protection mechanisms. Ensure compliance with security standards and regulations.
  • Compatibility Testing : Test compatibility with external systems, APIs, and third-party components. Validate interoperability and data exchange protocols. Ensure seamless integration with different platforms and environments.

Difference between Manual Testing and Automated Testing

Parameters Manual Testing Automation Testing
Definition In manual testing, the test cases are executed by the human tester. In automated testing, the test cases are executed by the software tools.
Processing Time Manual testing is time-consuming. Automation testing is faster than manual testing.
Resources requirement Manual testing takes up human resources. Automation testing takes up automation tools and trained employees.
Exploratory testing Exploratory testing is possible in manual testing. Exploratory testing is not possible in automation testing.
Framework requirement Manual testing doesn’t use frameworks. Automation testing uses frameworks like Data Drive, Keyword, etc.
Reliability Manual testing is not reliable due to the possibility of manual errors. Automated testing is more reliable due to the use of automated tools and scripts.
Investment In manual testing, investment is required for human resources. In automated testing, investment is required for tools and automated engineers.
Test results availability In manual testing, the test results are recorded in an excel sheet so they are not readily available. In automated testing, the test results are readily available to all the stakeholders in the dashboard of the automated tool.

For more Refer Manual Testing vs Automated Testing

Unit Testing vs Integration Testing

S. No. Unit Testing Integration Testing
1. In unit testing, each module of the software is tested separately. In integration testing, all modules of the software are tested combined.
2. In unit testing tester knows the internal design of the software. Integration testing doesn’t know the internal design of the software.
3. Unit testing is performed first of all testing processes. Integration testing is performed after unit testing and before system testing.
4. Unit testing is white box testing. Integration testing is black box testing.
5. Unit testing is performed by the developer. Integration testing is performed by the tester.

For more Refer Difference between Unit Testing and Integration Testing

Conclusion

Integration testing is a critical phase in software development that ensures all components work together seamlessly. Various approaches like Big-Bang, Bottom-Up, Top-Down, and Mixed Integration Testing help validate the integration points and interactions between modules. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, catering to different project needs. Proper integration testing helps identify defects early, ensuring the reliability, performance, and quality of the software product.

Frequently Asked Questions on Integration Testing

Who performs integration testing?

QA testers, test engineers, and also developers.

Is API testing integration testing?

As part of an integration test.

Which tool is used for integration testing?

SoapUI



sanjoy_62

Integration Testing - Software Engineering - GeeksforGeeks (4)

Improve

Previous Article

Functional Testing - Software Testing

Next Article

Exploratory Testing

Please Login to comment...

Integration Testing - Software Engineering - GeeksforGeeks (2024)

FAQs

Integration Testing - Software Engineering - GeeksforGeeks? ›

Integration testing is a software testing technique that focuses on verifying the interactions and data exchange between different components or modules of a software application.

What is integration testing in software engineering? ›

Integration testing -- also known as integration and testing (I&T) -- is a type of software testing in which the different units, modules or components of a software application are tested as a combined entity.

What are the four types of integration testing? ›

Integration testing ensures that different parts of a software application work seamlessly when combined. It focuses on detecting and resolving issues that arise from the interactions between modules or subsystems. Approaches include top-down, bottom-up, big bang, and incremental testing.

What is the difference between integration testing and system testing? ›

System testing is a testing level in which tests are performed to know if a complete build aligns with functional and nonfunctional requirements made for it. In contrast, Integration testing is a testing stage where two or more software units are joined and tested simultaneously.

Is integration testing done by QA? ›

Integration testing can be conducted manually by QA teams, usually in parallel with the development process. The process usually starts with the development team committing new code to the shared repository, then a series of unit tests are triggered to validate the new code.

Is API testing integration testing? ›

API integration testing is the process of testing your integration through making sure that every component of the integration will work as intended with the API. There are many components to integration testing, including the API authentication, pagination, rate limiting, and response bodies.

What is an example of integration test? ›

An Example of Integration Testing
Test Case IDTest Case ObjectiveExpected Result
1Validate the log-in and the mailbox's module interface linkControl is transferred to the mailbox
2Validate the mailbox and the Delete Mails Module interface linksChosen e-mail is sent to the Deleted/Trash folder.
Aug 13, 2024

Which tool is used for integration testing? ›

SoapUI is a popular open-source tool used for testing web services, including SOAP and REST APIs. It is also commonly used as an integration testing tool with a user-friendly graphical interface that allows users to create test cases, define test steps, and configure test data easily.

What is another name for integration testing? ›

A mixed integration testing is also called sandwiched integration testing. A mixed integration testing follows a combination of top down and bottom-up testing approaches. In top-down approach, testing can start only after the top-level module have been coded and unit tested.

Who is responsible for integration testing? ›

The testers are responsible for system integration testing, particularly the end-to–end test. Testers often ask the product owner or business analyst for help in developing the test scenarios and reviewing the cases.

Who performs integration tests? ›

The integration testing is performed before the system testing and after the unit testing. This specific testing can be executed by QA testers, test engineers, and also developers.

Is integration testing the same as UI testing? ›

Integration Tests compiles and test on local machine using Real Response. UI Tests compiles and test on local machine/device farm using Mock Response.

What are the disadvantages of integration testing? ›

However, the drawback of integration testing is that it does not reflect the defect source. It becomes important to identify the discrepancies in the small blocks before we test the system as a whole. Moreover, it is easier to find a defect with unit testing than with integration testing.

Do we write test cases for integration testing? ›

Create test cases : Prepare test cases for each scenario and define the input and expected outputs. Set up test environment : Create a test environment that closely mirrors the production environment for better test accuracy.

Is integration testing part of UAT? ›

SIT involves testing the overall system of a product before integration, while UAT is a validation test performed by the end user. System integration testing (SIT) and user acceptance testing (UAT) are the parts of the testing process.

What comes after integration testing? ›

There are four main stages of testing that need to be completed before a program can be cleared for use: unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing.

Is integration testing a black box test? ›

Unit Testing is a kind of white box testing, whereas Integration Testing is a kind of black-box testing. For Unit Testing, accessibility of code is required, as it tests the written code, while for Integration Testing, access to code is not required, since it tests the interactions and interfaces between modules.

What is the difference between integration testing and automation testing? ›

Integration testing checks two or more modules combined to perform tasks. Functional automation testing tests the behavior of the application when it functions as a whole.

What is the difference between integration testing and regression testing? ›

System testing examines the overall functionality of a completely integrated system. Integration testing verifies how the individual modules work when integrating with other modules. Regression testing checks new changes, and bug fixes can't affect the existing functionalities of a system.

Top Articles
Guide to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico - Cost of Living, Safety and Things to Do
Addresses: CERTIFIED MAIL or REGISTERED MAIL: When it is Required | Central District of California
Farepay Login
Ets Lake Fork Fishing Report
Fusion
Plus Portals Stscg
Green Bay Press Gazette Obituary
Osrs But Damage
A Fashion Lover's Guide To Copenhagen
2024 Non-Homestead Millage - Clarkston Community Schools
104 Whiley Road Lancaster Ohio
Enterprise Car Sales Jacksonville Used Cars
Justified Official Series Trailer
Overton Funeral Home Waterloo Iowa
Google Flights Missoula
E22 Ultipro Desktop Version
3476405416
Noaa Ilx
Webcentral Cuny
Vegas7Games.com
Baja Boats For Sale On Craigslist
Margaret Shelton Jeopardy Age
Doctors of Optometry - Westchester Mall | Trusted Eye Doctors in White Plains, NY
Gillette Craigslist
Umn Biology
Cvs Sport Physicals
Mchoul Funeral Home Of Fishkill Inc. Services
Kamzz Llc
Ofw Pinoy Channel Su
Clearvue Eye Care Nyc
Baldur's Gate 3 Dislocated Shoulder
2016 Honda Accord Belt Diagram
Despacito Justin Bieber Lyrics
Directions To 401 East Chestnut Street Louisville Kentucky
Devotion Showtimes Near The Grand 16 - Pier Park
Sc Pick 4 Evening Archives
Daly City Building Division
Indio Mall Eye Doctor
Lima Crime Stoppers
Ucsc Sip 2023 College Confidential
Immobiliare di Felice| Appartamento | Appartamento in vendita Porto San
Arcane Bloodline Pathfinder
Walgreens On Secor And Alexis
Does Target Have Slime Lickers
Sechrest Davis Funeral Home High Point Nc
Wgu Admissions Login
Willkommen an der Uni Würzburg | WueStart
Dicks Mear Me
Product Test Drive: Garnier BB Cream vs. Garnier BB Cream For Combo/Oily Skin
Otter Bustr
Pauline Frommer's Paris 2007 (Pauline Frommer Guides) - SILO.PUB
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Last Updated:

Views: 5835

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (46 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Birthday: 2001-01-17

Address: Suite 769 2454 Marsha Coves, Debbieton, MS 95002

Phone: +813077629322

Job: Real-Estate Executive

Hobby: Archery, Metal detecting, Kitesurfing, Genealogy, Kitesurfing, Calligraphy, Roller skating

Introduction: My name is Gov. Deandrea McKenzie, I am a spotless, clean, glamorous, sparkling, adventurous, nice, brainy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.