Is Rust Set to Replace C++ in the Future? (2024)

FAQs

Is Rust Set to Replace C++ in the Future? ›

In conclusion, while it is too early to predict whether Rust will completely replace C++ in the future, it is clear that Rust's unique combination of safety, performance, and expressiveness makes it a compelling choice for many developers and organizations.

Rust and C++ are totally different and unrelated languages that are used for totally different and unrelated tasks. They are both great languages, really great. Neither one of them will die every time soon. Rust is not a successor or a replacement for C++.

If you are looking for a well-supported and framework-rich language, you will probably choose C++. In other cases, you might want your code to be extremely safe, avoid memory leaks and other undefined behavior then start learning Rust. It is said that Rust still lacks tools and frameworks.

Rust also has some plus points when it comes to building ML and AI applications that deal with complex data structures or do efficient memory management. In the Future There Will Be More Libraries And Toolkits Utilized For Rust That Are Intended For Scientific Computation Or Deep Learning Computation.

Rust's generics are uglier and way more verbose than C++ templates for numeric code. Rust has better aliasing guarantees and nicer multi-threading, but I guess that's something OP is willing to manually deal with in C++. Most of them, for instance, Rust, Julia, and Cland even share the same backend.

When comparing, Rust performance vs C++ is often cited as being faster because of its unique components. More often than not, their speed depends on the program being developed, the compiler, and the quality of the code. Thus, if your product written in C++ performs badly, poor code may be the culprit.

The code ends up quite laborious, and it's just not suitable for many things, and it doesn't play so easily with C. Most projects do not require what Rust provides at the cost it provides it at.

Learning C and C++ remains relevant, and it's quite likely that their relevance persists in 2024.

Each language has its own distinct set of features and applications, and their suitability for different types of projects varies dramatically. For instance, if your startup specialises in desktop applications, C++ is a suitable option, while Rust is better suited to systems programming and web assembly projects.

C++ is a well-supported and framework-rich language, but if you want your code to be extremely safe, avoid memory leaks, and other undefined behavior, you might choose Rust instead. If your main priority is speed, both C++ and Rust are equal in this aspect.

Is Rust losing popularity? ›

Rust is growing in popularity, but it still has some way to go. The research on Rust's growing popularity as a programming language aligns closely with similar analysis from Stack Overflow's 2023 developer survey.

Rust Crashing Fixes

Outdated Steam Client. Low Virtual Memory. Missing game files. Discord overlay sometimes causes crashes.

As the language matures further and developer experience continues improving, Rust seems poised to potentially reshape the landscape of systems programming languages over the next decade.

Rust is One of the Fastest Growing Programming Languages, According to The IEEE Spectrum Development report by Tiobe Co. There are 2.8 million coders writing in Rust, and companies from Microsoft to Amazon regard it as key to their future.

Tech people tend to be very against "hype", and anything they see as too good to be true, they counter with very harsh anti-hype criticism. Rust claims to solve memory safety, which has been a pain for as long as system programming existed, so it sounds like too good to be true. It's in human nature to dislike change.

The US government came up with the ADA programming language. Now, that's a roaring success. They're less likely to be used for new projects, but old ones still use them. Just like how some projects still use COBOL today, C and C++ aren't going away.

Although Rust is easier to use, C++ has a larger community with all the extensive libraries needed to create safe code. While Rust is still developing, C++ once went this way. If you're interested in which language to learn or choose for your project – the answer depends on your needs.

“replaced” not that C++ will no longer be useful, but in terms of relevance. It will still be there, but you may not see the need when you can use efficiently use Carbon. This is not going to happen tomorrow or next. C++ will still be relevant in the next decade.

Rust is particularly a game changer for modern embedded applications with RTOS where safety and concurrency matters. It will not replace the legacy resource-constrained systems designed on C to do the bare-minimum embedded stuff (yes, Rust is not coming to 8086).