Publishing in low-tier journals (in case they are notpredatory journals) is not bad, however, it is risky. In a low-tier journal, it isless likely for you to receive high-quality reviewer suggestions to improveyour manuscript. In addition, there is less chance for your work to be foundand read by those who should read it.
Researchers often have several strategies for finding the papersthat they should read. Normally, they have a list of a few high-caliberjournals that they always scan with the emergence of the latest articles or issues.They also search a few keywords for specific topics when undertaking a review ofliterature either before starting a new project or when they are drafting theresults.
In case your paper is published in a low-tier journal, it isless likely to be found unless they are searched through keywords. If thenumber of relevant papers is high, scientists often will read those in high-tierjournals first, believing them to be the highest-quality papers.
If your paper is not read, it might as well not have been conducted,and in case nobody cites it, it diminishes the strength of your academic resume.A prestigious publication on your CV will make it noticeable (regardless ofcitations) while having a low-tier publication on your CV will not do much forit (unless you mention that it has many citations).
The benefit of low-tier journals is that they are normally an easier way to have your research published. Therefore, submission to a low-caliber journal that has a low rejection rate allows you to publish your work and get on with your next work rather than revising and re-writing a lot of work.
Now, why would someone want to publish in a lower-caliber journal when better journalsexist?
The answer may be one or more of the following:
Some institutions do not care at all about publications (rather they care about money and projects or specific works). If it is the case, the publication is a kind of show-off to keep a record of what the person did at that specific time, and any journal will do it for this purpose.
Some institutions care aboutpublications, though they do not mind the journal rank. In this case, you cansimply publish in any journal you choose.
Some higher-ranked journals misuse their rank to ask for money, have a long review time, and the like). In such cases, the choice of lower rank is quite sensible.
Better journals are often morecompetitive. It is a common scenario for a paper that is rejected in high-rank journalX to end up in lower-rank journal Y.
Some people really don’t careabout the “better” journal and the impact factor matter. They believe that itis a mean way to keep academics in checkand controlled by bureaucrats. Therefore, they do not restrict themselves andpublish in any journal they want since once upon a time academia was defined byits freedom and they want to preserve their freedom.
A prestigious publication on your CV will make it noticeable (regardless of citations) while having a low-tier publication on your CV will not do much for it (unless you mention that it has many citations). The benefit of low-tier journals is that they are normally an easier way to have your research published.
Cons: Limited Visibility and Impact: Low-tier journals typically have lower readership and citation rates compared to top-tier journals. This means your research may reach a smaller audience and have less influence on the field.
Is it easier to publish papers in journals with lower impact factors than journals with higher ones? - Quora. No. The unstated premise of the question is that journals have a high Impact Factor because they are selective for the “best”, “most novel”, or “highest impact” research.
Predatory publishers use questionable tactics to profit from scholarly research. They exploit faculty and students by soliciting articles (often through spam emails) and usually request payment for publishing in advance. And, of course, the quality of the journals is sub par.
Publishing in high-impact journals can open doors when you are climbing the academic career ladder: Prestigious grants, permanent positions, and opportunities for interesting collaboration often seem to follow publishing success. And of course, so does the recognition that the science you are doing is good.
Publishing in journals that are not reputable can diminish the credibility of your research, limit your career, and may result in little or no dissemination and uptake.
In general, an impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1. The very prestigious journal Nature had an impact factor of 69.504 in the year 2021.
The higher the impact factor, the better and the more important the journal is. Out of the 229 categories in which impact factors are computed, in 2020, the median IF was higher than 4 in 11 categories, it was between 3 and 4 in 53 categories, and in the majority, that is, in 165 categories it was lower than 3.
Yes, Frontiers is a predatory journal. Regardless, they are a huge producer of the scientific articles that enter the literature: 3rd most cited and 6th largest publisher! That's a lot of papers that go through the same "peer review" process that let this through.
There is no one standard definition of what constitutes a predatory publisher but generally they are those publishers who charge a fee for the publication of material without providing the publication services an author would expect such as peer review and editing.
In a low-tier journal, it is less likely for you to receive high-quality reviewer suggestions to improve your manuscript. In addition, there is less chance for your work to be found and read by those who should read it. Researchers often have several strategies for finding the papers that they should read.
Publishing within Q1 in the native professional community is completely impossible. However, why is this of any importance? We, as bibliometricians, all know our leading journals, respect them and their authors, and enjoy making our research visible through these venues.
Impact Factors are used to measure the importance of a journal by calculating the number of times selected articles are cited within the last few years. The higher the impact factor, the more highly ranked the journal.
While publishing in Q1 or Q2 journals may enhance visibility and prestige, Q3 and Q4 journals still serve as valuable outlets for disseminating research findings, especially in niche or emerging fields.
A Q2 journal has moderate visibility and citation among various scientific publications. It still publishes high-quality research compared to Q3 and Q4 and comes under the 26-50% quartile ranking. The impact of this research is significant but not as good as that of Q1 journals.
The higher the impact factor, the better and the more important the journal is. Out of the 229 categories in which impact factors are computed, in 2020, the median IF was higher than 4 in 11 categories, it was between 3 and 4 in 53 categories, and in the majority, that is, in 165 categories it was lower than 3.
Answered By: Laurissa Gann. Aug 29, 2024 1121299. Impact Factors are used to measure the importance of a journal by calculating the number of times selected articles are cited within the last few years. The higher the impact factor, the more highly ranked the journal.
Introduction: My name is Corie Satterfield, I am a fancy, perfect, spotless, quaint, fantastic, funny, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.
We notice you're using an ad blocker
Without advertising income, we can't keep making this site awesome for you.
