Risk vs return in ESG investments - is there really a trade-off? (2024)

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing is a form of sustainable investing that considers a company’s performance and impact on various ESG criteria, such as climate change, diversity, human rights, corporate governance, and more. ESG investors aim to align their investment choices with their personal values and social goals, as well as to avoid companies that may pose reputational or regulatory risks.

But does investing in ESG portfolios affect the financial returns and risks of investors? Is there a trade-off between pursuing sustainability and profitability? In this article, we will review some of the recent research and evidence on this topic and explore the implications for investors.

The Relationship Between ESG and Corporate Financial Performance
One of the main questions that ESG investors face is whether incorporating ESG criteria into their investment decisions will result in lower or higher returns than investing in traditional portfolios. To answer this question, researchers have examined the relationship between ESG performance and corporate financial performance (CFP) using various measures such as stock returns, profitability, valuation, and risk.

The relationship between ESG and corporate financial performance can be analyzed from different perspectives:

Risk Management: Strong ESG practices can help companies identify and mitigate various risks. For example, a company that actively manages its environmental impact may avoid regulatory fines or reputational damage. A robust governance structure can prevent scandals and ethical breaches, which could otherwise lead to significant financial losses.

Cost Reduction: Sustainable practices, such as energy efficiency and waste reduction, can lead to cost savings. Companies that prioritize employee welfare and well-being might experience lower employee turnover and attract top talent, which can ultimately enhance productivity and reduce recruitment and training costs.

Revenues and Market Opportunities: Embracing sustainable practices can open new market opportunities, especially as consumers and investors increasingly prefer environmentally and socially responsible companies. Businesses that cater to this demand can experience increased sales and revenue growth.

Access to Capital and Cost of Capital: Many investors now consider ESG factors when making investment decisions. Companies with strong ESG performance may find it easier to access capital from socially responsible investors and may benefit from lower borrowing costs due to reduced risks.

Long-Term Resilience: Integrating ESG factors into corporate strategies can contribute to the long-term resilience of companies, ensuring they can adapt to changing market dynamics and evolving stakeholder expectations.

However, it's essential to note that the relationship between ESG and financial performance is complex and context-specific. While numerous studies suggest a positive correlation between strong ESG practices and financial performance, the causal link can be challenging to establish definitively. Additionally, the impact of ESG factors on financial performance may vary across different industries, regions, and time frames.

The Performance of ESG Funds Compared to Traditional Funds
Another way to assess the impact of ESG investing on returns and risks is to compare the performance of ESG funds to traditional funds. ESG funds are mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that apply ESG criteria to select or exclude investments from their portfolios. They may also engage with companies to influence their ESG practices or advocate for policy changes.

A recent study by Morgan Stanley (2019) analysed the performance of nearly 11,000 mutual funds from 2004 to 2018 using Morningstar data. The authors found that there was no consistent and statistically significant difference in total returns between sustainable funds and traditional funds. However, they also found that sustainable funds experienced a 20% smaller downside deviation than traditional funds, meaning that they had lower volatility and downside risk.

Studies like these indicate that investing in ESG funds does not entail a trade-off in terms of returns and may even offer some advantages in terms of risk reduction and stability. They also suggest that ESG factors can help investors identify companies that are better prepared to cope with environmental and social challenges and opportunities.

Conclusion
ESG investing is not only a way to express one’s values and preferences but also a way to enhance one’s portfolio performance and risk management. The evidence from academic research and industry reports shows that there is no trade-off between investing in ESG portfolios and achieving competitive returns. On the contrary, ESG investing may offer some benefits in terms of lower volatility, higher resilience, and better alignment with long-term trends.

However, ESG investing is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Investors should consider their own objectives, preferences, and risk tolerance when choosing an ESG strategy. They should also be aware of the challenges and limitations of ESG data, ratings, and methodologies, which may vary across providers and sources. Finally, they should keep in mind that ESG investing is not a substitute for fundamental analysis, diversification, and due diligence but rather a complement to them.

(The author of the article is Mr. Sidhavelayutham M, Founder & CEO, Alice Blue)
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)