Should we call Rust a Failed Programming Language? (2024)

FAQs

Is Rust a bad programming language? ›

Rust is not a memory safe language, and does not embody safety practices. There's a lot of work to be done, a lot of the world to be fixed, and I could do away with the noise they make to mask the lack of work.

Rust is One of the Fastest Growing Programming Languages, According to The IEEE Spectrum Development report by Tiobe Co. There are 2.8 million coders writing in Rust, and companies from Microsoft to Amazon regard it as key to their future.

Tldr: It's too new. Rust is a promising language, but because it's so recent, you're not very likely to find good libraries or docs. It doesn't have what something like C has, and that's over 50 years of existence.

Rust is growing in popularity, but it still has some way to go. The research on Rust's growing popularity as a programming language aligns closely with similar analysis from Stack Overflow's 2023 developer survey.

Flexibility Python is applicable in many areas of technology. It supports several domains, like web development, machine learning, etc., with many libraries. While Rust is great for system programming, it offers less flexibility than Python.

Rust and Python both have their strengths and are suitable for different parts of data and development projects. Python excels in rapid development, data analysis, and machine learning, while Rust offers performance, safety, and control, making it ideal for systems programming and performance-critical applications.

Rust upsets people because Rust's solution to memory safety doesn't require anything particularly modern in terms of theoretical underpinnings.

Rust and corrosion can cause significant damage to machinery and equipment; weakening metal structures, causing them to fail and leading to increased repair and replacement costs.

Restricting programmers of what they can or cannot use, Rust doesn't have decent inheritance and exceptions, making it simple yet interfering with the availability of programming paradigms among the programmers. No doubt, Rust's popularity started declining from the year 2018.

The most popular programming languages I saw them use were Python, Javascript, Golang, C, C++, Rust, and Java!

Does Rust have any future? ›

Rust also has some plus points when it comes to building ML and AI applications that deal with complex data structures or do efficient memory management. In the Future There Will Be More Libraries And Toolkits Utilized For Rust That Are Intended For Scientific Computation Or Deep Learning Computation.

Rust at Work

34% of 2023 survey respondents use Rust in the majority of their coding at work — an increase of 5pp from 2022.

Switching to a more modern topic, the introduction of the Rust language into Linux, Torvalds is disappointed that its adoption isn't going faster. "I was expecting updates to be faster, but part of the problem is that old-time kernel developers are used to C and don't know Rust.

The C++ Killers (Not You, Rust) | Hacker News. [Languages like Rust] do help you to write more features with fewer bugs, but they are not of much help when you need to squeeze the very last flop from the hardware you rent. I do think that Rust helps you squeeze out that last 1% of performance over C++.

Most of what makes Rust relatively hard is that the compiler is less forgiving of errors than other programming languages, so that a program that Rust accepts is more likely to be correct than a program that simply compiles/runs written in another language.

When comparing, Rust performance vs C++ is often cited as being faster because of its unique components. More often than not, their speed depends on the program being developed, the compiler, and the quality of the code.