The state of Arbitrum's progressive decentralization | Arbitrum DAO - Governance docs (2024)

PUBLIC PREVIEW DOCUMENT

This document is currently in public preview and may change significantly as feedback is captured from readers like you. Click the Request an update button at the top of this document or join the Arbitrum Discord to share your feedback.

Progressive decentralization is the process of gradually increasing the decentralization of a system over time. This document details the current state of progressive decentralization for the Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova chains, the two chains currently governed by the Arbitrum DAO.

The components of Arbitrum's progressive decentralization

The following components determine the degree of decentralization for Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova:

  1. Chain ownership
  2. Validator ownership
  3. Sequencer ownership
  4. Data Availability Committee (DAC) ownership (applies only to Arbitrum AnyTrust chains like Arbitrum Nova).

Let's evaluate the current status of these components for both Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova, beginning with chain ownership.

1. Chain ownership

  • Description: A chain's "owner" has the ability to change the protocol in various ways, including upgrading the core smart contracts, setting system parameters, and pausing the system.
  • Current status: Governed by Arbitrum DAO. Chain ownership of both Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova is under the control of the Arbitrum governance system. The Arbitrum Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO), made up of $ARB token-holders and delegates, can carry out chain-owner operations through governance votes. The Security Council can also carry out chain-owner operations; it can act quickly through a 9 of 12 multisig wallet, but only in critical emergency situations. The Security Council can also act slowly through a 9 of 12 multisig wallet in non-emergency situations to carry out routine and minor upgrades, such as minor bug fixes. The members of the Security Council (split by cohort) are elected every six months by the Arbitrum DAO.
  • Risks:
    • If 9 of the Security Council members are compromised or behave maliciously, the system and users' funds could be compromised.
    • If a malicious proposal is successfully put through DAO governance, or if 9 of the Security Council members are compromised or behave maliciously, the system's safety could be compromised. In either of these cases, users will have several weeks to withdraw their funds back to Ethereum before the proposal takes effect.
  • Changes To Current Status: The governance system currently has the ability to alter governance itself.

2. Validator ownership

  • Description: Validators are responsible for confirming the valid state of the Arbitrum chains back on L1.
  • Current status: Permissioned Validation on both Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova is currently allow-listed to a committee of public entities. You can see the list of validators here. Governance currently has the power to change this status.
  • Risks: If there is not a single honest active validator, and a malicious validator proposes an invalid state update, the system's safety could be compromised.
  • Changes to Current status: The Arbitrum governance system (see #1) currently has the power to modify the Validator allow-list, such as by adding or removing members or removing the allow-list entirely.

3. Sequencer ownership

  • Description: The Sequencer is typically responsible for collecting and ordering users' transactions.
  • Current status: Centralized. The Sequencers for both Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova are currently maintained by the Arbitrum Foundation. Governance currently has the power to select new Sequencers.
  • Risks: The Sequencer has the ability to delay the inclusion of a user's transaction by up to 24 hours and reorder transactions over short time-horizons. The Sequencer, however, cannot compromise the system's safety or prevent a transaction from ultimately being executed.
  • Changes to Current status: The Arbitrum governance system (see #1) currently has the power to elect a new entity as the Sequencer.

4. Data Availability Committee (DAC) ownership

note

This applies only to Arbitrum AnyTrust chains like Arbitrum Nova.

  • Description: AnyTrust chains like Arbitrum Nova rely on a permissioned committee to store the chain's data and provide it on demand.
  • Current status: 6-member committee. The Arbitrum Nova chain has a 6-party DAC, whose members can be seen here. Governance has the ability to remove or add members to the committee.
  • Risks: If 5 of the 6 committee members in conjunction with the Sequencer behave maliciously and collude, the safety of the system can be compromised.
  • Changes to Current status: The Arbitrum governance system (see #1) currently has the power to change the DAC, such as by adding or removing members or modifying the power it has over the system.

Allowlisted validators

These are the current allowlisted validators for every public Arbitrum chain:

Arbitrum One

Arbitrum Nova

Arbitrum Goerli (testnet)

Data Availability Committee members

These are the current members of the 5-of-6 data availability committee (DAC) in Arbitrum Nova:

  • ConsenSys Software Inc.
  • QuickNode, Inc.
  • P2P.org
  • Google Cloud
  • Offchain Labs, Inc.
  • Opensea Innovation Labs Private Limited
The state of Arbitrum's progressive decentralization | Arbitrum DAO - Governance docs (2024)
Top Articles
What are the Roles and Responsibilities of a Civil Site Engineer
Manage your Projects on Google Earth - Android
Umbc Baseball Camp
Fan Van Ari Alectra
Hotels Near 625 Smith Avenue Nashville Tn 37203
Algebra Calculator Mathway
Wannaseemypixels
Zoebaby222
Craigslist Labor Gigs Albuquerque
litter - tłumaczenie słowa – słownik angielsko-polski Ling.pl
454 Cu In Liters
8 Ways to Make a Friend Feel Special on Valentine's Day
Michaels W2 Online
Summer Rae Boyfriend Love Island – Just Speak News
Viha Email Login
Billionaire Ken Griffin Doesn’t Like His Portrayal In GameStop Movie ‘Dumb Money,’ So He’s Throwing A Tantrum: Report
Clear Fork Progress Book
How Much You Should Be Tipping For Beauty Services - American Beauty Institute
TBM 910 | Turboprop Aircraft - DAHER TBM 960, TBM 910
Decosmo Industrial Auctions
Drift Boss 911
Shiftselect Carolinas
R&S Auto Lockridge Iowa
Silky Jet Water Flosser
Cognitive Science Cornell
Margaret Shelton Jeopardy Age
Cable Cove Whale Watching
Mynahealthcare Login
Yale College Confidential 2027
Democrat And Chronicle Obituaries For This Week
Stephanie Bowe Downey Ca
Gabrielle Enright Weight Loss
Garrison Blacksmith's Bench
What Are Digital Kitchens & How Can They Work for Foodservice
Ny Post Front Page Cover Today
Tirage Rapid Georgia
The Best Restaurants in Dublin - The MICHELIN Guide
Tsbarbiespanishxxl
Craigslist Boats Dallas
Ferguson Showroom West Chester Pa
Is Ameriprise A Pyramid Scheme
Breaking down the Stafford trade
Funkin' on the Heights
From Grindr to Scruff: The best dating apps for gay, bi, and queer men in 2024
Dobratz Hantge Funeral Chapel Obituaries
Joy Taylor Nip Slip
Mail2World Sign Up
Oak Hill, Blue Owl Lead Record Finastra Private Credit Loan
SF bay area cars & trucks "chevrolet 50" - craigslist
Black Adam Showtimes Near Kerasotes Showplace 14
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rueben Jacobs

Last Updated:

Views: 6189

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rueben Jacobs

Birthday: 1999-03-14

Address: 951 Caterina Walk, Schambergerside, CA 67667-0896

Phone: +6881806848632

Job: Internal Education Planner

Hobby: Candle making, Cabaret, Poi, Gambling, Rock climbing, Wood carving, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Rueben Jacobs, I am a cooperative, beautiful, kind, comfortable, glamorous, open, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.