The Taskforce for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (2024)

Framework

The TCFD’s recommendations are based on four thematic areas representing core company elements, each with its recommended disclosures:

• Governance
  • Describe the board’s oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities.
  • Describe management’s role in assessing and managing climate-related risks and opportunities.
• Strategy
  • Describe the climate-related risks and opportunities the organization has identified over the short, medium and long term.
  • Describe the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization’s businesses, strategy and financial planning.
  • Describe the resilience of the organization’s strategy, considering different climate-related scenarios, including a 2°Celsius or lower scenario.
• Risk Management
  • Describe the organization’s processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks.
  • Describe the organization’s processes for managing climate-related risks.
  • Describe how processes for identifying, assessing and managing climate-related risks are integrated into the organization’s overall risk management.
• Metrics and Targets
  • Disclose the metrics used by the organization to assess climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process.
  • Disclose Scope 1, Scope 2 and, if appropriate, Scope 3 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and related risks.
  • Describe the targets used by the organization to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets.

Progress

The TCFD’s recommendations were introduced in 2017 and have since been widely adopted across global industries. As of October 2021, the Task Force had over 2,600 supporters, including 1,069 financial institutions responsible for assets of $194 trillion. TCFD supporters now cover 89 countries and jurisdictions and nearly all sectors of the economy, with a combined market capitalization of over $25 trillion. Some key numbers include:

• Over 120 regulators and governmental entities worldwide support the TCFD.
• Brazil, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the European Union have made TCFD reporting mandatory for certain entities.
• Nearly 60% of the world’s 100 largest public companies support the TCFD and/or report according to TCFD recommendations.
• As part of Climate Action 100+, more than 500 investors with over $47 trillion in assets under management are engaging with the world’s largest corporate greenhouse gas emitters to strengthen their climate-related disclosures by implementing TCFD recommendations.
• Expert users find the impact of climate change on a company’s business and strategy as the “most useful” for decision-making.

Despite these encouraging numbers, further progress is needed: only about 50% of reviewed companies aligned with at least three of TCFD’s 11 recommended disclosures, and the completeness and quality of disclosures vary significantly. Progress can be expected due to mandatory (rather than voluntary) disclosure requirements and regulations becoming more common, while more companies make the commitments necessary to help fight climate change. Also, as disclosure recommendations are more widely followed, best practices will be implemented to improve the recommendations year-to-year, encouraging more companies to participate. In addition, there are increasingly more third-party assessments of TCFD-recommended disclosure ratings by environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) research firms.

Challenges and opportunities

To assess the TCFD’s challenges and opportunities, UL 360 investment-grade software categorizes reporting groups as:

• Advanced reporters
• Listed firms with no/limited reporting
• Private firms

Advanced reporters

Companies and firms already reporting TCFD’s recommended disclosures will be challenged by an increasing focus on the quality and completeness of their reporting, while investors benchmark across industries and identify gaps in strategy and risk management. It will become essential to track and compare TCFD’s approach to reporting with similar approaches to disclosure — primarily that of CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project). Doing so will require more in-depth climate reporting, data comprehension and collaboration. Failure to adequately or accurately report climate-related financial disclosures could expose companies and firms to legal risks.

Advanced reporters who demonstrate leadership in effectively managing the risks and opportunities of climate change are likely to gain significant investment. Transparency in reporting TCFD-recommended disclosures shows a commitment to fighting climate change — and it’s good for business.

Listed firms with limited or without reporting

The listed firms that are not advanced reporters include various companies with differing levels of climate-related financial disclosures. Some follow only mandatory requirements, while other firms participate in a limited number of voluntary standards. Of the listed firms, the majority meet basic requirements, and the challenge and opportunity are one and the same: report and disclose more. Listed companies that report limited or no climate-related information must take the sometimes-challenging steps to effectively integrate annual climate-related reports into their business strategy, risk management and governance. By doing so, they stand to gain the investment benefits and prestige of advanced reporters.

Private firms

Private firms face the biggest challenges in reporting climate-related financial information, but they may also benefit from the greatest opportunities. Historically, private firms have largely been exempted from mandatory reporting and free from public investor pressure to report on voluntary standards. For some firms, reaping greater benefits means they need to develop entirely new capabilities of climate-related scenario analysis and processes and incorporate climate change into both strategy and operations. The opportunity here lies in “greening up” business operations and demonstrating a willingness to combat climate change — both of which may attract additional investments.

Climate change is a real and present threat. Regardless of investor focus, companies that take steps to reduce risk and pursue opportunities may generate significant long-term value.

Solutions

For companies that follow (or plan to follow) the TCFD’s recommendations or other climate-related or ESG standards, elements of the reporting process can be streamlined through UL Solutions technology. We have the reporting software you need, as well as years of experience working with customers in several related areas, including:

• Quantitative carbon footprint data collection and verification.
• Qualitative response creation workflow across functions and user types.
• Consistency in TCFD and other climate-related reporting.

At UL Solutions, we have built these capabilities into our ESG and Sustainability Management Software. As you seek to start or improve your climate-related financial disclosures, bear in mind that UL services are designed and deployed with companies across industries and sizes from first-time reporters to sustainability leaders.