Before the revolution, French society was divided into three estates or orders: the First Estate (the clergy), Second Estate (the nobility) and Third Estate (France’s commoners). The Third Estate was by far the largest of the three, taking in everyone from the poorest itinerant peasants to the wealthiest businessmen. The frustrations and grievances of the Third Estate would give rise to the French Revolution; its diversity and differences would produce many of its failures.
Contents hide
1.Diversity
2.The peasantry
3.Urban dwellers
4.Deteriorating conditions
5.The bourgeoisie
6.Frustrated ambitions
Diversity
The Third Estate comprised around 27 million people, or 98 percent of the population of France. As might be expectedin such a large group, it contained considerable diversity.
There were many different classes and levels of wealth represented in the Third Estate, as well different professions and ideas. Its members lived in rural, provincial and urban locations. They ranged from lowly beggars and struggling peasants to urban artisans and labourers; fromshopkeepers and the commercial middle classes to the nation’s wealthiest merchants and capitalists.
Despite the Third Estate’s enormous size and economic importance, it played almost no role in the government of the Ancien Regime. This lack of participation was a significant source of frustration, particularly for wealthy and educated members of the Third Estate.
The peasantry
Peasants inhabited the bottom tier of theThird Estate’s social hierarchy. Comprising between 82 and 88 percent of the population, peasant-farmers were the nation’slowest social strata.
While levels of wealth and income varied, it is reasonableto suggest that most French peasants were poor. A very small percentage of peasants owned land in their own right and were able to live independently as yeoman farmers. The vast majority, however, were either feudal tenants, métayers (tenant sharecroppers who worked someone else’s land) or journaliers (day labourers who sought work wherever they could find it).
Whatever their situation, all peasantswere heavily taxed by the state. If they were feudal tenants, peasants were also required to pay dues to their local seigneur or lord. If they belonged to a parish, as most did, they were expected to pay an annual tithe to the church. These obligations were seldom relaxed, even during difficult periods such as poor harvests, which pushed many peasants to the brink of starvation.
Urban dwellers
Other members of the Third Estate lived and worked in towns and cities. The 18th century was a period of industrialand urban growth in France, thoughmost cities remainedcomparatively small. There were only nine French cities with a population exceeding 50,000 people. Paris, with around 650,000 people, was by far the largest.
Most commoners in the towns and cities made their living as merchants, skilled artisans or unskilled workers.Artisans worked in industries like textiles and clothing manufacture, upholstery and furniture, clock-making, locksmithing, leather goods, carriage making and repair, carpentry and masonry. A few artisans operated their own business but most worked for large firms or employers.
Before doing business or gaining employment, an artisan had to belong to the guild that managed and regulated his particular industry. Unskilled labourers worked as servants, cleaners, haulers, water carriers, washerwomen, hawkers – in short, anything that did not require training or membership of a guild.
Many Parisians, perhaps as many as 80,000 people, had no job at all: they survivedby begging, scavenging, petty crime and prostitution.
Deteriorating conditions
The lives of urban workers became increasingly difficult in the 1780s.Parisian workers toiledfor meagre wages: between 30 and 60 sous a day for skilled labourers and between 15 and 20 sous a day for the unskilled.Wages rose by around 20 percent in the 25 years before 1789, however prices and rents increased by 60 percent in the same period.
The poor harvests of 1788-89 pushed Parisian workers to the brink by driving up bread prices. In early 1789, the price of a four-pound loaf of bread in Paris increased from nine sous to 14.5 sous, almost a full day’s pay for most unskilled labourers.
Low pay and high prices were compounded by the miserableliving conditions in Paris.Accommodation in the capital was so scarce that workers and their families crammed into shared attics and dirty tenements, most rented from unscrupulous landlords. With rents running at several sous a day, mostworkers economised by sharing accommodation. Many rooms housed between six and ten people, though 12 to 15 per room was not unknown.
Conditions in these tenements were cramped, unhygienic and uncomfortable. There was no heating, plumbing or common ablutions; the toilet facilities were usually an outside cesspit or open sewer while water was fetched by hand from communal wells.
The bourgeoisie
Not all members of the Third Estate were impoverished. At the apex of the Third Estate’s social hierarchy wasthe bourgeoisie or capitalist middle classes. The bourgeoisie were business owners and professionals with enough wealth to live comfortably.
As with the peasantry, there was also diversity within their ranks. The so-called petit bourgeoisie (‘petty’ or ‘smallbourgeoisie‘) were small-scale traders, landlords, shopkeepers and managers. The haute bourgeoisie (‘high bourgeoisie‘) were wealthymerchants and traders, colonial landholders, industrialists, bankers and financiers, tax farmers and trained professionals, such as doctors and lawyers.
The bourgeoisie flourished during the 1700s, due in part to France’s economic growth, modernisation, increased production, imperial expansion and foreign trade.The haute bourgeoisie rose from the middle classes to become independently wealthy, well-educated and ambitious.
As their wealth increased so did their desire for social status and political representation. Many bourgeoisiecraved entry into the Second Estate. They had money to acquirethe costumes and grand residences of the noble classes but lacked their titles, privileges and prestige.A system of venality allowed the wealthiest of thebourgeoisie to buy their way into the nobility, though by the 1780s this was becoming frightfully expensive.
“The social structure on the European continent still bore an aristocratic imprint, the legacy of an era when, because land was virtually the sole source of wealth, those who owned it assumed all rights over those who worked it… Almost the whole population was lumped into a ‘third order’, called in France the Third Estate. Aristocratic prerogatives condemned this order to remain eternally in its original state of inferiority. [But] throughout … France, this ordering of society was challenged by a long-term change which increased the importance of mobile wealth and the bourgeoisie, and highlighted the leading role of productive labour, inventive intelligence and scientific knowledge.”
Georges Lefebvre, historian
Frustrated ambitions
The thwarted social and political ambitions of the bourgeoisiecreated considerable frustration. The haute bourgeoisie had become the economic masters of the nation, yet government and policy remained the exclusive domains of the royalty and their noble favourites.
Many educated bourgeoisie found solace in Enlightenment tracts, which challenged the foundation of monarchical power and argued that government should be representative, accountable and based on popular sovereignty. When Emmanuel Sieyes published What is the Third Estate? in January 1789, it struck a chord with the self-important bourgeoisie, many of whom believed themselves entitled to a hand in government.
What is the Third Estate? was not the only expression of this idea; there was a flood of similar pamphlets and essays around the nation in early 1789. When these documents spoke of the Third Estate, however,they referred chieflyto the bourgeoisie – not to France’s 22 million rural peasants, itslandless labourers or itsurban workers. When the bourgeoisie dreamed ofrepresentative government, it was a government that represented the propertied classes only. The peasants and urban workers were politically invisibleto the bourgeoisie– just as the bourgeoisiewas itself politically invisible to theAncien Régime.
1. The Third Estate contained around 27 million people or 98 percent of the nation. This included every French person who did not have a noble title or was not ordained in the church.
2. The rural peasantry made up the largest portion of the Third Estate. Most peasants worked the land as feudal tenants or sharecroppers and were required to pay a range of taxes, tithes and feudal dues.
3. A much smaller contingent of the Third Estate were skilled and unskilled urban workers in cities like Paris. They were poorly paid, lived in difficult conditions and were pressured by rising food prices.
4. At the pinnacle of the Third Estate was the bourgeoisie: successful business owners who ranged from the comfortable middle class to extremely wealthy merchants and landowners.
5. Regardless of their property and wealth, members of the Third Estate were subject to inequitable taxation and were politically disregarded by the Ancien Régime. This exclusion contributed to rising revolutionary sentiment in the late 1780s.
Citation information
Title: ‘The Third Estate’
Authors: Jennifer Llewellyn, Steve Thompson
Publisher: Alpha History
URL: https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/third-estate/
Date published: September 3, 2019
Date updated: November 5, 2023
Date accessed: September 14, 2024
Copyright: The content on this page is © Alpha History. It may not be republished without our express permission. For more information on usage, please refer to our Terms of Use.
