Uganda's anti-EACOP protest takes a controversial turn as activists face prolonged detention. A group of passionate environmental advocates, arrested for their demonstration at Stanbic Bank on August 1, are now facing an extended stay in Luzira Prison. The Buganda Road Chief Magistrate, Ms. Winnie Nankya, has repeatedly denied them bail, a decision that has sparked outrage and raised questions about justice.
These 12 activists, primarily students from the Students Against EACOP Uganda movement, were initially charged with public nuisance. But here's where it gets controversial—their bail applications have been consistently rejected, with the magistrate citing their involvement in multiple protests. The activists have already spent over three months in prison, and their case is set to return to court on November 6.
The named suspects include Teopista Nakyambadde, Shammy Nalwadda, Dorothy Asio, and several others. On October 20, Ms. Nankya refused to consider the latest bail request, claiming the case had progressed too far. This decision was met with criticism from defense lawyer Mr. Kato Tumusiime, who argued that the court's actions infringed upon the activists' constitutional rights and implied predetermined guilt.
Mr. Tumusiime passionately stated, "This denial of bail is not only harsh but illegal and unacceptable. It suggests a guilty verdict without a fair trial." He vowed to continue fighting for his clients' rights, emphasizing the importance of an independent judiciary.
The activists' demonstrations have targeted various institutions in Kampala, including Parliament, embassies, and banks, urging them to withdraw support from the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP). They believe EACOP poses significant environmental risks, while government officials and project supporters argue it will boost Uganda's economy through oil production.
As the activists' plight continues, a crucial question arises: Is this a fair legal process, or are the activists being punished for their activism? The public's opinion is divided, and the court's next move will undoubtedly shape the future of environmental activism in Uganda.
