What are the best sources of data for market analysis? (2024)

In my experience, customer feedback is crucial for providing context to less subjective methods of Market analysis, but if you count on it alone you will wind up making a product that only addresses the loudest voices not the most common use cases.

Customer feedback is one kind of data input into realizing the vision, validating hypothesis that are critical to establishing what you are looking for. In addition it should always be looked in sense of trends. It should be continuous and it should be carefully gathered to avoid corrupting it with biases, preconditions, misleading conclusions. Lastly, one should have a good sample before marking any informed decision or establishing conclusions.

Customer feedback is crucial. Using feedback analytics tools to consistently track user feedback can we helpful to identify areas with biggest customer pain points. Ex: Feedback analysis via getfeedback.com

Customer feedback should be a weighted source of data. Depending upon if your product is driven by technology, driven by customers, or driven by product vision. An additional consideration is a phase at which the product or product feature is and also if it is B2B product offering or B2C offering in the same product. Social media, surveys might dilute the vision of the product or product offering or just creates confusion among the stakeholders reducing the growth of the product. As a best practice, even though being a very powerful method of designing the product/product feature, the weight of this component should be well understood in developing the product/ product feature.

It is crucial to approach customer feedback with caution. Designing, distributing, and analyzing feedback tools require careful consideration to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data collected. Biases can arise if the sample of customers providing feedback is not representative of your target market. Incomplete or misleading feedback may result if the questions are poorly designed or if respondents are influenced by external factors. It is important to use validated and standardized measurement scales, include open-ended questions to capture detailed insights, and analyze the data objectively to derive meaningful conclusions.

In addition to above, I find conferences a great way to understand the market. Infact, attending them distills key trends without sifting through vast information that is available on the web. One doesn't have to attend the conferences real-time but can see recorded sessions that are often available post the event.

I agree, but competitive analysis should always be taken with a grain of salt. Commonly much of the competitor information you can find will be marketing information about their product. In addition, a competitor providing a feature does not necessarily mean that it is a good feature! You do not want your product to simply mirror what your competitors do instead you want to differentiate yourself from the rest of the market.

For many companies, this may be an under-utilized source. Rather than asking your users and customers about their intents and needs, invest in tools that help you actually *see* their behaviors. Reporting on actual behavior can often be more accurate (avoids response and sample biases) and helps contextualize other forms of research. Trust the user's own actions as a source of inferring what they might actually want, in concert with their qual & quant responses. Remember that most research and insights is more easily understood when presented with multiple sources. Customer behavior + competitive analysis + market research = a fuller picture of what users want and why they behave like they do.

Las mejores fuentes de datos para análisis de mercado pueden variar según la industria y los objetivos específicos del análisis, pero algunas fuentes comunes incluyen datos de ventas, encuestas a clientes, datos de redes sociales, datos demográficos, información de competidores, datos económicos y gubernamentales, entre otros. También se pueden considerar datos de investigación de mercado de empresas especializadas en el área de interés.

Translated

I agree with the prior comment that this may be underutilized, surprising also how challenging it can be to get access to company data, particularly across functional organizations.

I find that data analysis is more often used to measure trends about whether the latest update had an impact on customer behavior. While quite useful for validating this, a far greater but less utilized approach is to use data analysis to inform the approach used for gathering customer and market feedback.

(edited)

For assessing the market through MVP, need to ensure that following aspects are taken into account: 1. Define your target market: Before building an MVP, understanding target market is for the analysis to be effective. 2. Create a hypothesis: Based on your understanding of your target market, create a hypothesis about what they need and how they will use your product. 3. Gather 360 Feedback & Iterate: Get feedback on the product's usability, value proposition and usage metrics. The insights received should then feed into the product backlog for iterating through the product to make it more appealing to your market. The consideration would be to focus on high impact features whilst balancing the complexity of enabling the features.

To ensure robust market validation, consider using a multi-tiered approach combining Minimum Viable Products (MVPs) with real-world A/B testing. For example, launch a simplified version of your product with core features to a small segment of your target audience. Track key metrics like user engagement, conversion rates, and customer feedback. Parallelly, conduct A/B tests to compare different product features or pricing strategies. This will not only validate the product's market fit but also provide granular insights into user preferences and behavior, thereby enabling more informed product development and marketing strategies.