What is 256 Bit Encryption? | Venafi (2024)

256-bit encryption is a data encryption technique that uses a 256-bit key to encode information, providing a high level of security. It is widely used in modern cryptography, including in securing sensitive data transmitted across the Internet and stored in various digital platforms.

With the dawn of e-commerce, a important question loomed: how could users trust the identity of entities lurking on the other side of the digital divide? In the Wild West days of the early internet, this question remained largely unanswered. Yet, as the years unfolded, a powerful safeguard emerged: the shield of 256-bit encryption.

What is 256-Bit Encryption?

256-bit encryption refers to an encryption method where the key used to encrypt and decrypt data or files is 256 bits long. This length makes the key incredibly secure, as it can generate more than 2^256 combinations (over 1.1 x 10^77) - a number so large that even the fastest computers cannot feasibly crack it. Commonly used in sophisticated encryption algorithms like AES and SSL, '256-bit' signifies the size of the key that both encrypts and decrypts the information. Each key is made up of 256 binary bits, or a sequence of 1s and 0s, which provides a high level of complexity and security. This military-grade encryption is trusted worldwide by governments, financial institutions, and advanced security systems to protect highly sensitive data, ensuring maximum protection against hacking and unauthorized access.

Imagine a bustling digital marketplace, where sensitive information like credit card numbers and personal details dance across invisible wires. 256-bit encryption acts as a fortress, cloaking this data in code with over 2^256 possible combinations – a number so vast that even the most potent supercomputers would struggle to crack it for eons.

Think of it like a bank vault guarded by a colossal, 256-digit padlock. Each digit, a single bit (either 0 or 1), contributes to the lock's unyielding complexity. Cracking such a code would require brute-forcing every possible combination – a monumental task akin to searching for a grain of sand on a cosmic beach.

This robust encryption method isn't just a theoretical marvel; it's the backbone of secure online transactions. From online banking to e-commerce giants, 256-bit encryption stands as a silent sentinel, safeguarding our digital lives with every click and swipe. In fact, AES 256-bit encryption is recognized as the strongest encryption standard available today.

Public Key Infrastructure to the Rescue!

This solution emerged through public key infrastructure (PKI), a framework outlining how to use public key encryption for authenticating participants in web transactions. Central to PKI are two types of keys: the public key, which is widely accessible, and the private key, kept confidential by its owner. These keys function in tandem, allowing one to use a public key to confirm that a message was indeed sent by the holder of the corresponding private key. Additionally, PKI facilitates asymmetric encryption, where a message encrypted with a public key can only be decrypted by someone with the matching private key.

Public and private keys meet in what are known as digital signatures. These coded messages abide by public key infrastructure which enables signers to use their private keys to create the digital signature. The mathematical algorithm underlying the private key creates a hash and encrypts the data, thereby producing a digital signature.

Electronic signature technology provider Docusign provides an example of how digital signatures can help authenticate an individual involved in a transaction:

"… Jane signs an agreement to sell a timeshare using her private key. The buyer receives the document. The buyer who receives the document also receives a copy of Jane’s public key. If the public key can’t decrypt the signature (via the cipher from which the keys were created), it means the signature isn’t Jane’s, or has been changed since it was signed. The signature is then considered invalid."

It's important that parties can verify the integrity of a digital signature. Therefore, public key infrastructure frequently requires the sender of a document and the recipient to agree on using reputable Certificate Authorities (CAs) for creating, conducting, and saving their asymmetric keys. A type of service provider, CAs are third-party organizations that help establish key security. They're responsible for issuing security certificates, electronic documents which contain a digital signature's public key and the identity associated with that key. Security certificates therefore help confirm the owner of a public key and are essential to creating a digital signature.

Security certificates don't last forever; CAs issue them for a specified period of time and then require owners to renew them. Once issued, these certificates appear in security certificate management systems and tie into the central directory, a repository of stored and indexed keys maintained by the public key infrastructure. If a CA has any reason to revoke a security certificate before it reaches its expiration, that document likely ends up in a certificate revocation list (CRLs). Browsers can use this list to not trust revoked security certificates, thereby protecting web users against bad actors who might seek to abuse expired/revoked security certificates.

How does 256-Bit Encryption work?

Here's how it typically works:

Key Generation: A random 256-bit key is generated, which will be used for both encryption and decryption processes. This key must be kept secret from unauthorized users.

Encryption Process: The plain text data is processed through a cryptographic algorithm, such as AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), which systematically scrambles the data using the 256-bit key. The result is encrypted data, or ciphertext, that is unreadable without the key.

Data Transmission: The encrypted data can then be safely transmitted over the Internet or stored on a device, as it cannot be deciphered without the corresponding key.

Decryption Process: To access the original data, the encrypted data is processed through the same cryptographic algorithm in reverse, using the same 256-bit key to produce the original plaintext.

256-Bit Encryption vs. 128-Bit Encryption

The choice between 256-bit and 128-bit encryption depends on specific needs for security, performance, and future resilience against evolving technological threats. Each offers a trade-off that suits different applications and risk levels.

Strength and Security:

• 256-bit Encryption: Provides a high level of security and is practically impervious to brute force attacks due to its 2^256 possible key combinations. It is recommended for environments requiring the highest security standards, such as military and financial applications.
• 128-bit Encryption: Though slightly less robust than 256-bit, 128-bit encryption is still very secure, with 2^128 possible key combinations. It offers sufficient protection for most consumer applications and is faster in terms of encryption and decryption processes.

Performance:

• 256-bit Encryption: Generally, requires more processing power and thus can be slower, especially in environments with less computational resources. This can be a significant factor when dealing with large volumes of data or on devices with limited processing capability.
• 128-bit Encryption: Tends to perform better and is less resource-intensive compared to 256-bit encryption. This makes it ideal for applications that require fast performance without a significant compromise on security, like streaming services or mobile apps.

Use Case Suitability:

• 256-bit Encryption: Preferred in scenarios where security is the paramount concern and where the potential risk or the value of the protected data justifies the additional computational overhead. Examples include securing sensitive corporate data, governmental communications, and blockchain technologies.
• 128-bit Encryption: Often used for securing web traffic, e-commerce transactions, and personal data where the balance between security and performance is important. It remains a strong choice for everyday encryption needs.

Future-Proofing:

• 256-bit Encryption: With the advent of quantum computing, 256-bit encryption is considered more future-proof against potential quantum attacks than 168-bit or 128-bit, as it offers a larger key size that would take longer for quantum computers to break.
• 128-bit Encryption: While currently secure against classical computing attacks, 128-bit encryption may potentially become vulnerable sooner in the quantum computing era.

The Evolution of Security Certificates

Security certificates come in many different forms. Most commonly, an organization purchases a security certificate and installs it on a web server. Doing so authenticates the identity of the website for web browsers and visitors as well as encrypts data transmitted between the website and the visitor.

To establish these secure communication channels, domain owners often obtain Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) security certificates. Netscape Communications originally developed SSL in 1994, which means it's most likely the first cryptographic protocol developed for the Internet. Today, SSL helps secure emails sent using the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), phone calls placed via the Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), files exchanged over the File Transfer Protocol (FTP), and processes that make use of other protocols. Of course, it also works with the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) to produce Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS), which establishes encrypted communications on the web.

The most recent version of Secure Sockets Layer is SSL 3.0. As internet security requirements became more sophisticated, SSL evolved into a more advanced and secure version known as TLS. The change in name from SSL to TLS occurred with the release of TLS 1.0 in 1999, which was an upgrade of SSL 3.0. This shift not only marked improvements in security features and encryption methods but also signified the protocol's standardization and adoption by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Today, TLS is widely recognized as the standard protocol for secure internet communication, replacing SSL in most applications.This successor protocol's latest version is TLS 1.3.

AES: Its Key Sizes and Role in 256-Bit Encryption

Underlying the actual data transmission of SSL and TLS is the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). A successor of the Data Encryption Standard (DES), AES is an encryption standard technique used by many cryptographic libraries. Organizations traditionally use AES for symmetric key cryptography, or use of the same key to encrypt and decrypt messages.

AES candidates support a fixed block length of 126 bits. But the standard supports three key lengths: 128 bits, 192 bits, and 256 bits. Most organizations require their employees to use AES 256-bit encryption because of the 2256 possible key combinations that a brute force attacker would need to try in order to guess the key.

To put things into perspective, it would take one billion billion years to crack a 128-bit key. This is already older than the age of the universe (13.82 billion years) and is therefore considered uncrackable. 256-bit encryption keys, by comparison, require 2128 times the computational power needed to break a 128-bit key. This size considerably raises the stakes of cracking a 256-bit encryption key. Using a hypothetical scenario provided by Wikipedia, say 50 supercomputers have the ability to try one billion billion key combinations each second. It would still take them 3×1051 years to exhaust the key space under 256-bit encryption.

Gain visibility into your encryption environment today.

Industries Benefiting from 256-bit Encryption

Each of the following industries relies on 256-bit encryption not just for protecting information but also for maintaining operational integrity, ensuring compliance with global regulations, and building trust among clients and stakeholders.

Financial Services:

• Security Needs: Financial institutions handle highly sensitive data, including bank account details, transaction records, and personal financial information.
• Benefits of 256-bit Encryption: It allows for the utmost security for online banking, financial transactions, and data storage, protecting against fraud and unauthorized access.

Healthcare:

• Security Needs: Healthcare providers manage protected health information (PHI), which requires compliance with strict privacy regulations like HIPAA.
• Benefits of 256-bit Encryption: 256-bit encryption secures patient records and communication between medical devices, ensuring patient confidentiality and regulatory compliance.

Government and Defense:

• Security Needs: These sectors deal with national security data, sensitive government communications, and classified information that must be protected at all costs.
• Benefits of 256-bit Encryption: It provides a high-security standard necessary to protect data from foreign threats and cyber espionage, making it suitable for securing top-secret communications.

Technology and Cloud Services:

• Security Needs: This industry involves massive data exchanges and storage solutions, where data breaches can affect millions of users.
• Benefits of 256-bit Encryption: It safeguards user data stored in the cloud, secures software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications, and protects proprietary technology information, contributing to trust and reliability in tech products and services.

E-commerce:

• Security Needs: Online retailers process countless transactions daily, involving sensitive customer data like credit card numbers and personal identifiers.
• Benefits of 256-bit Encryption: Encryption ensures that customer data is secure during transmission and storage, helping to prevent data breaches and boost consumer confidence in online shopping.

Telecommunications:

• Security Needs: The telecom industry requires the protection of data transmitted across various networks and devices.
• Benefits of 256-bit Encryption: It helps in securing voice and data traffic, protecting against unauthorized surveillance and access, and maintaining the integrity of the communications network.

Is it possible to crack 256-bit encryption?

Cracking 256-bit encryption through conventional means is currently considered virtually impossible due to the sheer computational power required. With 2^256 possible combinations, even the world's fastest supercomputers would need billions of years to test all possible keys through brute force. While theoretical vulnerabilities could exist, such as flaws in the cryptographic algorithm or implementation errors, these are generally addressed swiftly through updates and patches. Therefore, without exploiting such weaknesses, directly decrypting data encrypted with 256-bit keys by brute force is not feasible with current and foreseeable technology. As such, 256-bit encryption remains one of the strongest and most secure methods for protecting data against unauthorized access.

Threats to 256-bit Encryption and Safeguarding Measures

Brute Force Attacks:

• Threat: Although 256-bit encryption is highly secure, brute force attacks, which involve systematically checking all possible keys until the correct one is found, remain a theoretical risk.
• Safeguard: Implementing rate limiting and account lockout policies can mitigate brute force attacks by limiting the number of attempts an attacker can make, making it impractical to try every possible combination.

Side-Channel Attacks:

• Threat: These attacks exploit the physical implementation of the encryption system rather than the cryptographic algorithm itself. Attackers might analyze power consumption, electromagnetic leaks, or even processing times to extract cryptographic keys.
• Safeguard: Employing hardware that is specifically designed to resist side-channel attacks, such as chips with power analysis protection and tamper-resistant packaging, can help protect sensitive data.

Software Vulnerabilities:

• Threat: Encryption is often only as secure as the software that implements it. Bugs or flaws in software can provide openings for attackers to bypass encryption without needing to decrypt data directly.
• Safeguard: Regular software updates and patches, thorough security audits, and adopting a secure software development lifecycle are important to minimizing vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

Key Management Issues:

• Threat: Poor key management practices, such as using predictable keys, not changing keys regularly, or failing to protect key storage, can undermine the security of 256-bit encryption.
• Safeguard: Implementing robust key management policies that include secure key storage solutions, regular key rotation, and the use of hardware security modules (HSMs) can make sure that keys remain protected and are as robust as the encryption algorithm itself.

Insider Threats:

• Threat: Insiders with legitimate access to systems can sometimes bypass encryption to access sensitive data, either maliciously or due to coercion.
• Safeguard: Using strict access controls, conducting regular audits, and implementing user activity monitoring can help detect and prevent unauthorized access attempts by insiders

Quantum Computing: The Next Threat to 256-Bit Encryption

Quantum computing is an emerging threat to current cryptographic standards, including the widely used 256-bit encryption. Traditional encryption methods, such as RSA and ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography), rely on the difficulty of factoring large numbers or solving discrete logarithms, tasks that are manageable for classical computers but could potentially be undone by quantum algorithms. The most notable of these, Shor's Algorithm, introduced by mathematician Peter Shor, can factor large numbers and compute discrete logarithms in polynomial time, which could render these cryptographic mechanisms vulnerable once sufficiently powerful quantum computers are developed.

This looming threat has catalyzed a push towards developing quantum-resistant cryptography, often referred to as post-quantum cryptography. These new cryptographic systems seek to secure communications against an adversary equipped with a quantum computer, ensuring that digital security infrastructure remains intact and private communications stay confidential. The urgency of this development is highlighted by the fact that the data encrypted today could be at risk in the future when quantum computers become more available. making it important for organizations to start integrating quantum-resistant protocols to protect sensitive information from future threats.

Preparing now for the threats posed by quantum computing is important because of the "store now, decrypt later" strategy that adversaries may employ. This strategy involves collecting encrypted data with the intent to decrypt it later when quantum computing becomes sufficiently advanced. If sensitive data, such as state secrets, intellectual property, or personal information, is harvested today, it could be decrypted in the future, leading to significant breaches of security and privacy. Therefore, updating cryptographic standards now is imperative to protect data from future threats. Transitioning to quantum-resistant cryptography involves complex updates to infrastructure and systems that can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Early preparation allows organizations to phase in these changes gradually, reducing operational disruptions and costs associated with a rushed deployment. Proactive adaptation to quantum-resistant methods can provide a competitive advantage by ensuring business continuity and building trust with clients and stakeholders who are increasingly aware of and concerned about quantum threats.

Learn how Venafi can fortify your organization's infrastructure against quantum threats. Explore our solutions and take the first step towards PQC-readiness today.

Digital Certificates, Keys, and Machine Identities

Security certificates and 256-bit encryption keys managed by the public key infrastructure all constitute machine identities. These capabilities enable authentication and encryption for security protocols like SSL and TLS. But if not adequately protected, digital attackers could abuse them to target an organization's IT infrastructure., Attackers could abuse access to machine identities to steal trusted credentials and thereby bypass other security controls. Attackers could then steal private (including 256-bit encryption) keys, forge security certificates, compromise Certificate Authorities (CAs), use encrypted tunnels, and exploit machine identities to steal data and/or conduct digital espionage.

Machine identities are high-value targets for digital attackers and malicious insiders. Acknowledging this risk, organizations need to strengthen their machine identity security infrastructure. This effort begins with gaining global visibility into all certificates and keys used in internal and external infrastructures, the cloud, and other environments.