Structuring is a money laundering technique where large sums of illicit money are broken into smaller amounts and deposited separately to avoid detection. Those who report structuring may be eligible for rewards under the AML Whistleblower Improvement Act of 2022.
Updated September 8, 2023
Structuring, often referred to as “smurfing”, is a technique employed in money laundering and financial fraud. It involves breaking down large amounts of illegal funds into smaller, lesser amounts, which are then deposited separately into legit bank accounts to escape detection.
The primary reason behind structuring is to circumvent the regulations and reporting requirements that financial institutions must adhere to.
For instance, in the United States, banks are required to report any transaction exceeding $10,000 to the federal government. By splitting these amounts and depositing them in smaller increments over time, launderers can ostensibly remain under the radar.
Page Contents hide
1. How Does Structuring Work?
2. The Implications of Structuring
3. Whistleblowers: Report Structuring Under the Improved AMLA
4. The Importance of Hiring an AML Attorney
5. Our Firm’s Cases
6. Read More
How Does Structuring Work?
Money obtained from illicit actions is deemed “dirty.” Through structuring, this capital is “cleaned,” allowing its use without links to its criminal origins. How does this process work exactly? Below is a quick breakdown of this activity:
- Initial Collection: The launderer gathers a significant sum of illicit funds. This could be through illegal activities like drug trafficking, bribery, terrorism, extortion, or fraud.
- Breakdown: The funds are divided into smaller amounts, ensuring each segment remains below the threshold that requires reporting.
- Staggered Deposits: These smaller amounts are deposited into banks or financial institutions over a period, sometimes across multiple institutions or geographies.
- Layering: To further mask the source, these funds might be transferred between accounts, used to purchase assets, or even sent overseas.
- Integration: Once the money is successfully ‘cleaned’, it’s reintegrated into the economy, appearing as legitimate income or assets.
The method described above is one of the most common forms of structuring, often referred to as “smurfing.” However, structuring can take many forms, and the method outlined is not exhaustive.
The Implications of Structuring
At first glance, structuring may appear as just another financial strategy, but its implications run deep and are more damaging than one might assume.
The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime estimates that the amount of money laundered globally in one year is 2-5% of global GDP, or $800 billion to $2 trillion in current US dollars.
Much of this involves practices like structuring. By allowing these vast sums of illicit funds to circulate undetected, criminal networks grow stronger, directly challenging the foundations of societies built on principles of fair trade and integrity.
Furthermore, economies suffer from the repercussions of structuring.
A study from the International Monetary Fund highlighted that money laundering and its associated practices can erode financial institution soundness by undermining the integrity of financial markets. It diverts funds away from economically productive uses, feeding black markets and stunting growth in legitimate financial sectors. The long-term effects of such activities can lead to economic instability and reduced investor confidence.
Whistleblowers: Report Structuring Under the Improved AMLA
Under the AML Act, individuals, including those outside the U.S., can qualify for rewards by providing crucial information that aids successful investigations into money laundering offenses, such as structuring.
With the AML Whistleblower Improvement Act of 2022, whistleblowers can now receive between 10% and 30% of sanctions levied against money launderers, with the award contingent on the relevance of the shared information.
Whistleblowers are able to anonymously submit tips about money laundering and sanctions violations to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) by having a licensed U.S. attorney file the claim on their behalf. A whistleblower who files anonymously is still eligible for monetary awards under the whistleblower award provisions of the AML Act.
The Importance of Hiring an AML Attorney
Taking into account the complexity of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, along with its expansive reach covering various sectors and the heightened emphasis on whistleblower provisions, it becomes evident that navigating this terrain requires specialized knowledge.
Hiring an AML lawyer is strongly advised, primarily because such professionals are well-versed in the nuances of the Act. They can provide essential guidance to both organizations and individuals, ensuring compliance with the AML regulations and assisting whistleblowers in understanding their rights, protections, and potential rewards.
For individuals and entities aiming to operate within the law or whistleblowers seeking to come forward with critical information, the expertise of an AML attorney not only simplifies the process but also offers a shield against potential pitfalls, ensuring that actions taken align perfectly with the stipulations of the AML Act.
Our Firm’s Cases
On September 19, 2018, news broke of $230 billion money laundering scheme. The scheme moved rubles out of Russia, converted them to dollars at the Estonian branch of Danske Bank, and then moved the dollars to New York with the assistance of three correspondent banks (Bank of America, J.P Morgan, and Deutsche Bank).
Danske Bank admitted all of its internal controls designed to prevent money laundering had failed. The bank also revealed that the scheme had been reported to the highest levels of the bank by a whistleblower over four years before. The whistleblower’s identity was required to be secret. But it took only days for his name to leak out.
Soon the entire international banking world learned that the former Danske Bank manager Howard Wilkinson had exposed the largest money laundering scheme in history, and that the bank had tried to cover it up.
Read More
New Release
Rules for Whistleblowers
The ultimate guide to blowing the whistle and getting rewarded for doing what's right.
Subscribe for News & Resources
Receive exclusive updates and news from our firm.
Ready to Blow the Whistle?
Information submitted in the client intake form or in email from anyone seeking legal help is covered under the attorney client and work product privileges to the fullest extent of the law. We also highly encourage you to learn about our intake process before submitting an intake. Looking to join the team? Please visit our careers page to explore and apply to openings, fellowships, and internships at our firm.
Your communications are secured and sent over 256-bit SSL encryption. To protect your identity and confidentiality, do not use any devices owned or controlled by a private corporation or governmental entity. It is also recommended to protect your online identity by establishing a new email account that does not identify you and to avoid the use of other online platforms that may disclose your identity.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive whistleblower news and resources crafted by the partners and associates at KKC.
- VIEW ALL
- Alabama Whistleblower Law
- Alaska Whistleblower Law
- Arizona Whistleblower Law
- Arkansas Whistleblower Law
- California Whistleblower Law
- Colorado Whistleblower Law
- Connecticut Whistleblower Law
- Delaware Whistleblower Law
- Florida Whistleblower Law
- Georgia Whistleblower Law
- Hawaii Whistleblower Law
- Idaho Whistleblower Law
- Illinois Whistleblower Law
- Indiana Whistleblower Law
- Iowa Whistleblower Law
- Kansas Whistleblower Law
- Kentucky Whistleblower Law
- Louisiana Whistleblower Law
- Maine Whistleblower Law
- Maryland Whistleblower Law
- Massachusetts Whistleblower Law
- Michigan Whistleblower Law
- Minnesota Whistleblower Law
- Mississippi Whistleblower Law
- Missouri Whistleblower Law
- Montana Whistleblower Law
- Nebraska Whistleblower Law
- Nevada Whistleblower Law
- New Hampshire Whistleblower Law
- New Jersey Whistleblower Law
- New Mexico Whistleblower Law
- New York Whistleblower Law
- North Carolina Whistleblower Law
- North Dakota Whistleblower Law
- Ohio Whistleblower Law
- Oklahoma Whistleblower Law
- Oregon Whistleblower Law
- Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law
- Poland Whistleblower Law
- Puerto Rico Whistleblower Law
- Rhode Island Whistleblower Law
- South Carolina Whistleblower Law
- South Dakota Whistleblower Law
- Tennessee Whistleblower Law
- Texas Whistleblower Law
- Utah Whistleblower Law
- Vermont Whistleblower Law
- Virginia Whistleblower Law
- Washington Whistleblower Law
- West Virginia Whistleblower Law
- Wisconsin Whistleblower Law
- Wyoming Whistleblower Law
© 2021 Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto LLP. All Rights Reserved.
1710 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. All information submitted in the client intake form or in email from anyone seeking legal assistance is considered covered under the attorney client and work product privileges to the fullest extent of the law. While we treat your information as confidential, a lawyer-client relationship is created only by express written agreement signed by both you and Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto.