What is Token Burning? | Blockchain Basics | Elliptic (2024)

Introduction

In the blockchain world, when you destroy tokens, this is referred to as “burning”, and the creation of new tokens is called “minting”. Destroying tokens requires sending them to a burner address where the associated private key is not held by any individual or entity. It is essentially a blackhole that tokens can be moved into but not out from.

An example of one of these addresses is: 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dEaD

Usually, an address – or more correctly the underlying public key – is generated from a private key. However, a burner address can be generated by using a valid format but without first creating an underlying private key. As such, the above address is a vanity address – an address including human readable words – which follows the required address formatting rules for Ethereum accounts and includes the word “dEaD” as the suffix. Such an account is mathematically improbable to be able to generate via the standard process of private-public key generation, as it would take thousands of years to match so many characters. Therefore, it can be assumed as secure from someone secretly holding the private key.

However, it’s also possible to generate a burner address by creating a smart contract then setting it to self destruct and have it send any received funds to its self destructed state. For reference, burn addresses listed on Etherscan can be found here.

Any tokens – whether Ether, fungible ERC20 tokens or non-fungible ERC721s – sent to these addresses cannot therefore be recovered, since no one holds the underlying private key.

There are a number of reasons why you would burn tokens, and we’ll dig into a number of them here.

Deflationary Token Supply

Many cryptoassets have a finite total supply. There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoins, 45 billion Cardano (ADA) tokens and 84 million Litecoins, for instance. Though some assets have an infinite supply, such as USDC, which has new assets minted, and Dogecoin, which sees 10,000 new DOGE created every minute. Stellar previously had a 1% yearly inflation for its native asset XLM, though this was halted in the Protocol 12 upgrade.

Some cryptoasset projects hold a portion of assets in reserve or under a foundation in order to reduce the circulating supply and thus stimulate price action. For example, Binance with its BNB cryptoasset has committed to removing half of the 200 million supply via burning in order to help boost the price. As such, using an auto-burn formula, an amount of BNB is removed from the supply every quarter. The Q1 2022 burn saw over $741 million worth of BNB burned, with the transaction here showing the on-chain proof of burn.

Fee Structure

With the introduction of the Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP1559), a portion of fees received by miners per block is now burned. The rationale for this was to create a deflationary supply of the native token Ether, and to try to make fees more predictable on the network.

Since the introduction of this protocol functionality in August 2021, over 2.3 million Ether has been burned, which represents $4.3 billion in value at the time of writing. The amount burned per day will fluctuate depending on network activity. You can see more about the burning mechanism here.

Unlike other burn methods, this upgrade was introduced at the protocol level, so there is no burner address. Tokens are instead destroyed by the Ethereum blockchain itself.

NFT Claiming

Some non-fungible token (NFT) projects require you to send tokens to a burner address in order to claim their NFT. This was the case with the Hash Rush project which asked users to burn RUSH tokens in order to claim the exclusive in-game NFTs. Flipping this model, the digital artist Pak created the Burn.art project where users who burned their NFTs would receive ASH tokens that could be used to buy future exclusive artworks.

However, it’s also possible for the burn to be on a real-life item. This was the case when the BurntBanksy collective bought and then burned an original Banksy artwork. They then created a digital representation of the destroyed artwork as an NFT and sold it for almost $400,000.

As University College Dublin Lecturer Paul Dylan-Ennis puts it in The Conversation: “If you were to have the NFT and the physical piece, the value would be primarily in the physical piece. By removing the physical piece from existence and only having the NFT, we can ensure that the NFT – due to the smart contract ability of the blockchain – will ensure that no one can alter the piece and it is the true piece that exists in the world. By doing this, the value of the physical piece will then be moved onto the NFT.”

Stablecoin Algorithmic Peg Maintenance

Another reason a token may be burned is if it’s being used as an algorithmic method to maintain the peg of a stablecoin. This is the case for the Ampleforth (AMPL) token, which uses the rebase/elastic model to assess the current price of the token every 24 hours and if it’s below the desired peg, then AMPL will be removed and burned from holder’s wallets. Whereas if the price is above the peg, new AMPL will be minted and sent to all holder’s wallets.

It’s therefore clear that there are a number of scenarios in which tokens will be removed from circulation by burning tokens. This can involve sending them to a burner address or being removed at the protocol level.