Speed cameras: A 'cash grab' in Canada or a life-saving hero in Europe? The divide is stark, and it's time to uncover why one side embraces them while the other fights tooth and nail.
World (inspired by insights from global news sources)
Automated speed enforcement devices are a common sight throughout Europe, backed by research that highlights their impressive role in cutting down road accidents.
Ontario's leader labels them a money-making scheme, but across the pond, Europeans celebrate them as vital tools for preserving lives.
By Alex Rivera (drawing from experienced journalists like John Last) · Global Insights News
· Published: October 30, 2025, 4:00 AM EDT | Updated: Just a couple of hours ago
Tune in to this piece via audio
Around 6 minutes to read
Picture this: It's a chilly winter morning in 2024, in a quiet suburb outside Padua, Italy. Local drivers rub their eyes in disbelief at the sight of a speed camera that's been sliced apart with what looks like an industrial tool, complete with a bold graffiti message: 'Fleximan is coming.'
This wasn't a one-off prank. After a wave of similar sabotage incidents, the mysterious figure known as Fleximan has turned into a legendary symbol in Italy, sparking debates about rebellion against authority.
'He was seen as a hometown champion,' shared Tom Roper, a British educator who's run a school in the area for over 15 years and has witnessed the cultural shift firsthand. 'Folks would reach out to me, curious if I had any leads on who Fleximan really was.'
Yet, beneath the drama of these rogue attacks lies a deeper truth that's far less divided: In much of Europe, there's a strong, widespread agreement that speed cameras are effective and even welcome. They don't just catch speeders—they encourage safer driving habits overall.
'When you poll everyday people, you'll find solid backing for these enforcement measures,' explained Jenny Carson, who manages projects at the European Transport Safety Council in Brussels, Belgium. 'The public genuinely wants lower speeds on the roads to keep everyone safer.'
Take Italy as a prime example—it's leading the pack with over 10,000 operational speed cameras, more than any other European nation. A comprehensive 2018 survey across Europe revealed that almost 70% of Italians favored tougher penalties for speeding. Interestingly, even though about half admitted to exceeding speed limits in the past month, the support remains high. This shows how people can recognize the value of rules, even if they occasionally bend them. For beginners new to traffic safety discussions, think of it like seatbelt laws: Most know they're good for you, even if buckling up feels like a hassle sometimes.
Meanwhile, in Ontario, Premier Doug Ford is locked in a battle against these devices, dismissing them as a 'cash grab' and vowing to outlaw them entirely. So, as tensions rise in Canada—with Ford even floating ideas of redirecting camera tech toward crime-fighting instead—it's fascinating to explore: How has Europe built such enduring public and political buy-in for automated speed enforcement? And could this approach, which experts say prevents thousands of fatalities annually, offer lessons for North America?
Related: Ford plans to scrap speed cameras but eyes their use for tackling urban crime (insights from Canadian policy debates)
Also: Municipal leaders in Ontario plead with Ford to keep speed cameras as a safety tool (echoing calls from local associations)
The French Success Story
Flash back to 2002 in France. Following a string of devastating, headline-grabbing crashes that shook the nation, President Jacques Chirac made a bold pledge: Cutting traffic fatalities would be a top priority for his administration. Fast forward to today, and France boasts over 2,400 speed cameras dotted across its roads, a network that's evolved into a cornerstone of public safety.
Laurent Carnis, a leading expert in road safety at France's Université Gustave Eiffel, points out a key takeaway for places like Canada: True success with these systems hinges on strong leadership from the highest levels. 'Political will is absolutely crucial,' he emphasized. Without it, implementing and maintaining such programs becomes an uphill battle, as fragmented support can lead to inconsistent enforcement and public skepticism.
VIDEO HIGHLIGHT | Ontario's Premier Doug Ford Announces Speed Camera Ban:
Ford's Decision on Speed Enforcement in Ontario
September 25 | Runtime: 1:00
In a recent address, Ontario Premier Doug Ford declared that his administration will push forward with laws to eliminate speed cameras province-wide. Instead, they'll create a dedicated fund to support communities in adopting alternative strategies, like better signage, speed bumps, or community education programs, all aimed at calming traffic proactively.
In France, this top-down dedication paved the way for a unified national framework. It allows fines to be issued seamlessly to drivers from anywhere in the country—or even international visitors—ensuring no one slips through the cracks. This centralized approach, for those unfamiliar, means a ticket from a rural French road can follow you home, much like how parking fines work across state lines in the U.S.
Like many European neighbors, France didn't view speed cameras solely as a punishment mechanism; they doubled as a way to educate and change behaviors. The setup included two main types: stationary cameras, clearly marked with advance warning signs to acclimate drivers to the presence of monitoring (helping build trust and compliance over time); and portable units, deployed unpredictably to catch those attempting to evade the fixed ones.
'The fixed ones promote awareness and prevention, while the mobiles deliver the consequences for deliberate risks,' Carnis clarified. 'This dual strategy aligns with deterrence theory in criminology—showing consequences while encouraging self-regulation—and the data backs it up.'
But here's where it gets controversial: Across Europe, these setups have led to noticeable changes, with average driving speeds dropping by 10 km/h or more in monitored areas, and crash rates plummeting between 20% and 70%, depending on the location and implementation. 'We've calculated that around 1,000 lives have been spared each year, along with countless serious injuries,' Carnis added, underscoring the human impact behind the numbers.
Proven Results, Even in Canada
These outcomes mirror early successes in Canadian trials. For instance, cities like Toronto have seen speeds decrease by up to 20 km/h near installed cameras, creating safer zones around schools and neighborhoods. It's a quick win that demonstrates the tech's potential without needing massive infrastructure overhauls.
However, experts warn that this rapid effectiveness can backfire in unexpected ways. Once the most dangerous speeders are reined in, what's left are minor infractions, which can breed resentment. 'The big threats vanish almost immediately, leaving only the everyday slips,' Carnis noted. And this is the part most people miss: As the system 'succeeds,' it shifts focus to average drivers, fueling backlash.
In France, this dynamic has sparked growing pushback, including vandalism that has knocked out up to 75% of cameras in some regions recently. 'Suddenly, folks start grumbling that it's all about revenue, not safety,' Carnis observed. He draws a clever analogy for clarity: 'It's similar to vaccines—when they work effectively, fewer people get sick, so skeptics argue we no longer need them. But stopping now would let problems rebound.' This perspective challenges the 'cash grab' narrative by framing enforcement as preventive medicine for roads.
To counter this, specialists like Carnis recommend a targeted, open approach: Place cameras in high-risk spots, communicate clearly about their purpose, and adjust thresholds to focus on genuine dangers rather than nitpicking small errors.
'I advocated for initial settings that only triggered at 20 miles per hour over the limit—about 32 km/h—to prioritize the real speed demons,' shared Richard Retting, a veteran traffic safety consultant who pioneered the first automated systems in North American cities like New York. 'By honing in on extreme cases, you rally more public goodwill and avoid alienating everyday commuters.' For beginners, this means starting with the worst offenders to build trust, rather than catching everyone in a broad net.
This selective strategy directly addresses one of Ford's main gripes with Ontario's rollout. He's argued that ticketing drivers for just 5 or 10 km/h over feels punitive and unfair. In reality, the actual trigger is 11 km/h above the limit, yet even some of Ford's own team have been nabbed going triple that amount. Retting offers a nuanced counterpoint: 'Groups used to dodging traditional policing get touchy about impartial tech. But that's precisely its strength—it treats everyone equally, no favoritism.' And this is where opinions diverge sharply: Is automated fairness a feature or a bug?
Digging Deeper: Are Canada's Roads Setting Drivers Up to Fail?
Canada's speeding woes might stem from more than just attitudes—they could be baked into the infrastructure. Both Retting and Carnis emphasize that speed cameras alone aren't enough; limits must be realistic and enforceable first.
Countless studies reveal how Canada's broad lanes, generous shoulders, and overall forgiving road designs subconsciously invite faster driving. Add in modern vehicles with advanced safety aids—like automatic braking or lane-keeping assist—and drivers feel invincible, more detached from the real hazards of high speeds. As Carnis puts it simply for newcomers to the topic: 'Before cracking down on speeding, ensure the speed limit feels appropriate to the road's setup. Otherwise, it's like punishing someone for running in a marathon when the track is designed for sprints.'
Yet, even with smart planning, resistance persists. In Italy, where twisty, congested roads make speeding extra perilous, and cameras are pre-mapped on navigation apps, Fleximan's antics have emboldened critics. Italy's Deputy Premier Matteo Salvini has publicly slammed the system as a revenue ploy, signaling potential cracks in Europe's once-solid political consensus.
Tom Roper, the long-time expat driver who's collected a few tickets himself over years of European road trips, remains a fan. 'Local drivers can be wildly unpredictable—you need something to rein in the chaos,' he laughed. His view highlights a practical reality: In high-stakes environments, tech like this might be the only reliable safeguard.
About the Author
Alex Rivera is an independent journalist and storyteller based in Padua, Italy, with a background in covering remote regions from Canada's North to the Arctic. His work spans continents, including in-depth looks at Europe, the Middle East, and the U.S. South.
- Connect with Alex on social media (similar to Twitter profiles of seasoned reporters)
What do you think— are speed cameras a necessary evil for safer roads, or just another way governments squeeze money from drivers? Should Canada look to Europe's model, or carve its own path? Share your takes in the comments below; I'd love to hear if you've had a close call that changed your mind or if you side with the skeptics. Let's spark a real conversation!
