Imagine a powerful political figure, a so-called 'powerbroker' within the Labor Party, being linked to a college shutdown due to severe mismanagement and educational failures. This is exactly what happened in Adelaide, where the national regulator has taken drastic action against a training institution led by a prominent Labor personality. But here's where it gets controversial: Is this an isolated incident, or does it reveal deeper issues within the intersection of politics and education?
The regulator’s decision to deregister the college highlights serious governance and teaching shortcomings, raising questions about accountability and oversight. While the specifics of the case remain behind a paywall, the implications are clear: when institutions fail to meet basic standards, the consequences can be severe. And this is the part most people miss—how often do political connections influence the fate of educational bodies, and what does this mean for the students and the public trust?
For just $4 for the first 4 weeks (then $32 every 4 weeks), you can unlock the full story and gain unlimited access to articles, subscriber-exclusive newsletters, and a digital version of today’s paper. Alternatively, lock in a 12-month subscription at $5 a week (charged as $20 every 4 weeks) and save. With no lock-in contracts, you can enjoy full app and web access 24/7, read the paper online as it was printed, and explore 11 of our news sites (excluding The Australian).
But let’s pause for a moment: Should political figures be held to a higher standard when they lead educational institutions? Or is this simply a case of poor management, unrelated to their political standing? We’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments. Whether you agree or disagree, this story sparks a critical conversation about the role of politics in education and the consequences of failure. Subscribe now to dive deeper and stay informed.
