The swimming world is abuzz with controversy surrounding the recent NCAA meet format changes, and two prominent figures have shared their thoughts. The removal of 'B' finals has sparked a debate among athletes and coaches alike.
Virginia head coach Todd DeSorbo, a seasoned leader with an impressive record of five consecutive NCAA team titles, took to Instagram to voice his opinion. He acknowledged the changes, stating, "It is what it is..." but expressed his dislike for the elimination of 'B' finals, emphasizing the importance of providing athletes with more racing opportunities. DeSorbo suggested an alternative approach, proposing that 'B' finals could be held before or after the main events. He concluded with a note of optimism, ready to adapt to the new format.
But here's where it gets interesting: DeSorbo isn't alone in his criticism. Katharine Berkoff, a US Olympian and former NC State swimmer, also spoke out against the removal of 'B' finals. In an Instagram story, Berkoff passionately shared her thoughts, "I actually hate that they did that. I love watching NCAAs, and it's such a competitive meet." She expressed her hope that the NCAA might reconsider this decision.
This controversy has sparked a discussion among athletes and fans, with many questioning the rationale behind the changes. The removal of 'B' finals limits racing opportunities and may impact the overall competitiveness of the meet. It's a bold move that has divided opinions.
And this is the part most people miss: the impact on athletes' experiences. With fewer chances to race, swimmers might miss out on valuable learning and growth opportunities. It's a complex issue that warrants further exploration.
What do you think? Should the NCAA reconsider its decision to remove 'B' finals? Share your thoughts in the comments and let's spark a conversation about the future of swimming competitions!
